Thursday, April 24, 2014

AMERICA - Better Idea on Collage Campus Integration and Affirmative Action

"Class Action:  A Challenge to the Idea that Income Can Integrate America’s Campuses" by Nikole Hannah-Jones, ProPublica 4/24/2014


Update April 23, 2014:  The Supreme Court upheld Michigan’s voter-approved ban on affirmative action for women and racial minorities at public universities.  While the Court did not prohibit affirmative action altogether, it’s likely that other states may follow Michigan’s lead in eliminating the consideration of race in higher education and other areas.

Affirmative action occupies a telling place in a nation painfully aware of its racial inequities yet painfully divided over how to solve them.

Great numbers of Americans support the overarching goals of assuring equal access to educational opportunity and maintaining racial diversity in the country's institutions of higher learning.  At the same time, polls show Americans are deeply conflicted – often along racial lines – about policies that achieve those goals by allowing colleges to use race as a factor in their admissions decisions.

The latest chapter in this national struggle was supposed to come with the U.S. Supreme Court's consideration of an affirmative action case involving a white student and the University of Texas.  But the ruling – announced Monday amid much anticipation – merely sent the case back to the lower courts for reconsideration.

Affirmative action, in its threadbare form, lives for now.  But there was enough in Monday's opinion to suspect it will be diminished further in time.

All of which makes it an opportune moment to think again about what some people think could be a fairer and more palatable way of ensuring diversity on America's campuses – affirmative action based on class.  The idea seems simple enough:  This approach would give poor students of any race a helping hand into college, and any policy that gives an admissions boost to lower-income students would naturally benefit significant numbers of black and Latino students.

Richard Kahlenberg, a senior fellow at the progressive think-tank The Century Foundation, is one of the principal proponents of what has come to be called "the economic integration movement."

"My primary interest is in ensuring that we have a fair process that looks at the biggest disadvantages that people face today, which I see as class-based," Kahlenberg said in a recent interview.  "That will end up helping low-income and working-class students of all races."

Kahlenberg knows that many dispute this belief.  But he says skepticism directed at the class-based solution has to be weighed against its dim alternative:  If race-based affirmative action disappears with no program to replace it, African Americans and Latinos on college campuses will disappear too.  Studies show that African-American and Latino enrollment at the nation's top 200 colleges would plummet by two-thirds if colleges stopped considering race when deciding whom to accept.

Yet ignoring race does not wipe its effects away.  A formula that uses class while disregarding race may be politically popular, but many scholars say race remains so powerful a factor that a class-based system would seriously reduce black and Latino representation at American colleges from their current levels.

At the heart of their argument:  Poor white Americans are still privileged when compared to poor African Americans and Latinos.  Use class as the basis for admissions preference, studies show, and the nation's colleges will be flush with poor white students.  "There are disadvantages that accrue to African Americans and Latinos that are not explained by class," said Anthony Carnevale, director of the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.  "You simply cannot get race by using class."

The idea of abandoning race for an admissions system targeting those clinging to the bottom rungs of the economic ladder holds powerful sway for many who believe that in modern America race is no longer much of an obstacle to success.

There is no doubt that the greatest imbalance in American colleges is not white versus black or male versus female.  It is the wealthy versus everybody else.

Kahlenberg asserts that affluent students – those whose families earn at least $123,000 a year – outnumber poor students by 25-1 on the campuses of the nation's most select schools.  He said that while white Americans are twice as likely to earn a college degree as black Americans, the affluent are seven times as likely to earn one as the poor.

According to the most recent data available, about three-quarters of students at the nation's top 146 universities come from families in the upper quarter of the nation's economic scale.  Just 3 percent come from the bottom quarter.  A study released this year by The Brookings Institution documented how selective colleges enroll nearly all of the high-achieving high school seniors from families in the highest income quartile, but just one-third of the top low-income students.

"How should colleges ensure diversity?" PBS NewsHour 4/23/2014


SUMMARY:  The Supreme Court upheld a ban on affirmative action in Michigan; at least seven other states have enacted similar laws.  A New York Times study looking at five states found that African-American and Latino enrollment fell immediately at flagship schools.  Gwen Ifill gets views from Dennis Parker of the American Civil Liberties Union and Roger Clegg of the Center for Equal Opportunity.

No comments: