Showing posts with label NRA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NRA. Show all posts

Monday, December 11, 2017

GUN CONTROL - Banning Bump-Stocks

NOTE:  This could pass because the NRA Domestic Terrorist Organization does not oppose it.

"House passes major gun bill as senators debate bump-stock regulation" PBS NewsHour 12/6/2017

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  The gun debate took center stage on Capitol Hill Wednesday, as the House passed its first major piece of gun legislation since two of the deadliest mass shootings in U.S. history.  While the bill tightens the National Background Check system, it also includes a provision requiring states to recognize concealed carry permits across state lines -- a top priority for the NRA.  Hari Sreenivasan reports.

Monday, November 13, 2017

GUNS IN AMERICA - Background Checks

"How gun background checks work — and when they don't" PBS NewsHour 11/7/2017

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  New information about the Texas shooter's past behavior reveals he was able to bypass a patchwork of gun laws and purchase the weapon he used to kill 26 people on Sunday.  William Brangham breaks down the complicated landscape of our nation's gun laws.




"Closing gun background check loopholes may be 'common cause' for Democrats and Republicans, says Sen. Chris Murphy" PBS NewsHour 11/7/2017

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn) has been one of the most vocal advocates for reforming gun laws since the Sandy Hook tragedy in his own state.  As more becomes known about the man behind the massacre at a Texas church, lawmakers from both sides of the aisle are looking at the background check system, which critics think is broken.  Murphy joins Judy Woodruff to discuss reforms.

Monday, October 09, 2017

SATIRE - America's Addition


There's something going on in the world.  A situation we cannot ignore any longer and we need to address it.

Monday, June 27, 2016

GUNS IN AMERICA - Gun Ownership Debate

"Debate over gun ownership reemerges in Congress and the courts" PBS NewsHour 6/20/2016

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  In Congress and the courts, gun control took center stage Monday.  There was a partisan showdown in the Senate over four different measures.  Meanwhile, the Supreme Court declined an appeal of semi-automatic weapons bans.  Gwen Ifill talks to political director Lisa Desjardins, Marcia Coyle of The National Law Journal and Evan Osnos of The New Yorker about the debate on gun laws and gun ownership.

LISA DESJARDINS (NewsHour):  From courtrooms, to Congress, the often theoretical debate over guns touched ground today, eight days after the massacre in Orlando.

In Washington, a showdown on the Senate floor over four different gun control measures, from background checks to banning sales to those on the no-fly list.  It was a classic partisan duel.

SEN. HARRY REID (D-NV), MINORITY LEADER:  Republicans say hey, look, we tried.  And all the time, they're cheerleaders for bosses at the NRA.

SEN. JOHN CORNYN (R), Texas:  Our colleagues want to make this about gun control.  My colleagues many ways want to fight the symptoms without fighting the disease.

LISA DESJARDINS:  Lots of debate, but no expected changes, when all was said and done.

Across the street, Supreme Court justices decided not to hear an appeal of semiautomatic weapons bans in Connecticut and New York.  That means the bans stay in place.  They were enacted after the school shooting in 2012, at Newtown, Connecticut.

Families of the Newtown victims were also watching this courtroom in Bridgeport, where a state judge heard arguments about whether they can sue a gun manufacturer.  James Vogts represents Remington Arms, which made the semiautomatic rifle used in the Newtown shooting.

JAMES VOGTS, Attorney for Remington Arms:  It's really not the role of this court, or perhaps a jury, to decide whether civilians, as a class, broad class of people, are not appropriate to own these class of firearms.

LISA DESJARDINS:  Joshua Koskoff represents the families who are suing.

JOSHUA KOSKOFF, Attorney for Newtown Victims' Families:  It was an AR-15 rifle, a weapon, Judge, that was designed to be used in combat by our military to assault and kill enemies of war.  It was Remington's choice to entrust the most notorious American military killing machine to the public.

LISA DESJARDINS:  Recent polls show Americans generally support gun restrictions.  In a Reuters/Ipsos survey last week, about 71 percent approved of strong or moderate gun restrictions, while about 16 percent want basic limits and just 6 percent said firearms should have no or few restrictions.

But, as debate continues, so does the violence.  In Chicago yesterday, police reported something rare, an apparent gang-related shooting using not a handgun, but a semiautomatic assault rifle.

WOMAN:  When does it stop?  What's going to — how do we get help with this?  What do we do?

LISA DESJARDINS:  The Chicago victim was 17 years old.

GWEN IFILL:  For more on the recurring debate over gun laws and gun ownership, we turn now to Marcia Coyle, “NewsHour” regular and chief Washington correspondent for “The National Law Journal;” Evan Osnos, whose extensive report on concealed-carry laws appears in this week's “New Yorker” magazine; and, as you just heard, “NewsHour” correspondent Lisa Desjardins, who's been following the action on Capitol Hill.

As of now, this time 6:00 p.m. Eastern time tonight, do we have any — is there any possibility that any of the four gun bills that were up for a vote today might pass?

LISA DESJARDINS:  Realistically, no.  And we already know that one has failed, something that seems innocuous, increasing funding for background checks on the federal level.  That has not received 60 votes.

It was Republican amendment.  That didn’t clear.  We do not expect the other three to clear there that 60-vote bar either.

GWEN IFILL:  In spite of what we just saw in terms of public opinion?

LISA DESJARDINS:  That’s right.

And when you look at public opinion here, there’s a real disconnect.  You see overwhelmingly, not just Americans as a whole, Gwen, supporting things like background checks, some moderate restrictions, you could say, but Republicans as a group.

Recently, Pew and many other groups have polled Republicans and they find 80-some percent sometimes support background checks, but yet Republicans on Capitol Hill are going the exact opposite directions.



"Gun control bills fail despite momentum after Orlando shooting" by Alan Fram and Mary Clare Jalonick (both AP), PBS NewsHour 6/20/2016

Monday, May 23, 2016

OPINION - Shields and Brooks 5/20/2016

"Shields and Brooks on the NRA's endorsement of Donald Trump and the Bernie Sanders factor" PBS NewsHour 5/20/2016

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  Syndicated columnist Mark Shields and New York Times columnist David Brooks join Judy Woodruff to discuss the week in politics, including what the NRA's endorsement of Donald Trump means for GOP unity, whether Democrat Bernie Sanders still poses a serious threat to Hillary Clinton's nomination and what will happen to his supporters if she wins it.

Monday, July 27, 2015

OPINION - Shields and Brooks 7/24/2015

"Shields and Brooks on guns, Iran, and whether Clinton’s emails will turn into scandal" PBS NewsHour 7/24/2015

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  Syndicated columnist Mark Shields and New York Times columnist David Brooks join Judy Woodruff to discuss the week's news, including the recent wave of mass shootings, selling the Iran nuclear deal to Congress, and whether Hillary Clinton needs to worry about the latest round of email allegations.

Monday, February 25, 2013

GUN CONTROL - When Gun-Nuts Write Gun Laws

"When Gun Nuts Write Gun Laws, Nuts Have Guns" by Tom Scocca, Slate Magazine 12/21/2013

So this is what Wayne LaPierre came up with, with a week to reflect on the news that a law-abiding gun owner's legally purchased rifle, in the hands of her firearm-trained son, had been used to slaughter 20 kids:  more guns, more law-abiding gun owners, more more more lead-spraying death machinery, more killing to stop the killers until all the killers have been killed.  Only when we have eliminated the threat of "gun-free school zones," the danger and horror of children going through a school day unsurrounded by the implements of death, will we all feel safe.

People who live in the world of causes and effects and verifiable truths, the world the NRA has long since abandoned, had no trouble pointing out the flaws in LaPierre's analysis—the fact, for instance, that there had been an armed deputy sheriff on duty at Columbine High School on April 20, 1999.  Around the time LaPierre was speaking, someone in Pennsylvania was shooting another batch of people, including armed state troopers.

Guns kill people.  More guns kill more people.  What the NRA gets wrong—intentionally or delusionally or, in the psychologically and financially profitable zone where intention and delusion overlap—is its bedrock premise:  that gun killings are the work of Bad Guys, predators whose drive to hurt and steal and kill cannot be stopped by anything but a brave Good Guy armed with a powerful firearm and, not at all incidentally, trained through an NRA-backed firearms-training program.

And the NRA insists that these people—"the monsters and the predators," as LaPierre put it—will not be thwarted by gun control, except in the funny T-shirt both-hands-on-my-weapon sense.  The next Adam Lanza is already picking out his target, LaPierre said.

That's because the next Adam Lanza is almost certainly able to get his hands on a weapon to point at that target.  The original Adam Lanza was apparently too confused and low-functioning to navigate Connecticut's simple waiting period and buy one for himself.  But his mother, a gun enthusiast in good standing, had a stock of her own.  She reportedly had wanted to feel safe.

So Wayne LaPierre wants to talk about "evil," because evil is elemental and intractable.  Evil is part of the human condition.  You cannot legislate away evil.

Let's leave the darkest recesses of the soul for a second.  Two days before the Connecticut massacre, this happened:



This is not unknowable wickedness.  It's banal teenage rage and stupidity, amplified by a gun.  That's what everyday gun crime is—fleeting moments of thoughtless viciousness, made permanent with the wiggle of a finger.  The Jovan Belcher murder-suicide was an ugly domestic argument; Belcher's gun collection turned it lethal.  Maybe, as the gun enthusiasts argue, he might have resorted to using a knife or a club.  But that's a less likely result.  And even if it did happen, it would be less likely to be fatal.

In Australia, gun violence decreased markedly after the implementation of strict gun control measures.  In Bogota, the number of deaths by firearm is reportedly down 58 percent, after the mayor banned public possession of guns.  Take away instant, easy death-dealing, and the death rate drops.

LaPierre does not live in the realm of probabilities and harm reduction.  He lives in a sick, paranoid universe where guns substitute for law, custom, and morality.  Here he is, describing the country as he sees it, a place that teeters on the brink of collapse because of our national softness on crime:  "Add another hurricane, terrorist attack, or some other natural or manmade disaster, and you’ve got a recipe for a national nightmare of violence and victimization."

Violence and victimization.  Now is a good time to remember what really happened after Hurricane Katrina:  brutal cops and bands of racist civilians went around shooting and killing unarmed people.  Why?  Because they believed in the NRA message, that predators were waiting to attack law-abiding citizens.  And they were right about that.  They were just confused as to who the predators were.

The same confusion was apparently on George Zimmerman's mind.  Another armed citizen, looking out for danger—and finding it in a teenager walking home with a bag of Skittles.  This is what LaPierre wants to mobilize:  "millions of qualified active and retired police; active, reserve, and retired military; security professionals; certified firefighters, security professionals, rescue personnel; an extraordinary corps of patriotic, trained, qualified citizens."  With guns.  Guns, guns, guns.  Ready to use them.

And the police, too.  "With all the foreign aid the United States does, with all the money in the federal budget, can’t we afford to put a police officer in every single school?" LaPierre said.  Annie Lowrey of the New York Times quickly thumbnailed that proposal at $6.4 billion per year.

This is the most extraordinary thing about the NRA's ideology and the climate it's created.  By the time you read this, there will almost certainly be someone who has jumped to the comments to denounce gun regulations as an infringement of fundamental liberties.  It is only the presence of uncounted millions of guns, in the hands of uncounted millions of Americans—whether pointy-headed liberals recognize this as a "well-regulated militia" or not—that secures our freedom against the encroachment of a totalitarian police state.

Yet today, LaPierre got up and described the gun lobby's vision of our future:  "A police officer in every single school."  "Armed security ... building design ... access control ... information technology."  "An active national database of the mentally ill."

This is the NRA’s idea of a free country.  Kindergarteners on lockdown.  Federal monitoring of everyone's mental-health status.  Cops in every hallway.

The experts and counterexperts can and will keep arguing about the local and regional crime-rate effects under our ever-expanding concealed-carry and open-carry laws.  One trend line, though, seems obvious:  The Second Amendment and the Fourth Amendment have been moving in opposite directions.  The NRA has racked up legislative triumph after legislative triumph, extending gun rights into airports, bars, churches, and schools.  Yet rather than deferring to the armed public, the police have grown ever more militarized, ever less concerned with warrants, ever more willing to respond to disorderliness with overwhelming force.  The government is collecting your email and tracking your phone.  Drones are flying police missions in American skies.  More than 2 million people are incarcerated.

None of that came up in LaPierre's discussion today, though he had time to denounce video games and the media.  An ugly, violent, oppressive world is the world he wants.  It's the world that gun culture thrives in.  The only liberty that matters to these people is the liberty to kill.

Saturday, December 22, 2012

GUN CONTROL - NRA Response to Newtown Shootings

And from the 'more guns on our streets make us safer' organization.....

"NRA Rejects Calls for New Gun Laws, Advocates Armed Guards in Schools" PBS Newshour 12/21/2012

Excerpt

SUMMARY: Since the mass shooting in Newtown, Conn., the NRA has been the subject of criticism, but its leaders hadn't made any public statement. The group broke its silence in Washington when NRA leader Wayne LaPierre reacted to the attack. Ray Suarez gets a response to the NRA's address from Mark Glaze of Mayors Against Illegal Guns.

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

COLORADO - James Holmes Prelim

"As Colorado Shooter Appears in Court, More Details on How He Obtained Weapons" PBS Newshour 7/23/2012

Excerpt

SUMMARY: At a preliminary hearing, Colo. shooting suspect James Holmes remained silent and stoic. Gwen Ifill speaks with Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), University of Denver's Dave Kopel and the Pew Research Center's Mike Dimock on whether shootings influence public opinion on issues such as gun control and gun safety.

GWEN IFILL (Newshour): The world got a look today at the man who allegedly gunned down scores of people in Aurora, Colo., on Friday. He appeared at his initial court hearing as police pieced together what led up to the assault in a movie theater.

MAN: Please be seated.

GWEN IFILL: It was the first time he had been seen publicly since Friday's shootings, and James Holmes cut a bizarre figure, his hair dyed bright orange, his eyes dazed.

It was unclear if he was on medication, but the 24-year-old stared blankly or nodded off. And he never spoke as the judge explained the murder charges against him.

Afterward, District Attorney Carol Chambers said the state is considering asking for the death penalty. But she wants to hear from the victim's family.




Two significant excerpts

DAVID KOPEL, University of Denver: So if you had some kind of law that said, oh, every time somebody buys over 500 or 1,000 or whatever number you want to say of ammunition, that the federal government has to get notified, well, you wouldn't find anything of interest because that's such a common kind of thing to do.


REP. JAN SCHAKOWSKY (D-Ill.): I think most Americans do think that sensible gun safety legislation is important. But can you just imagine if those who were holding guns legally in that theater stood up, as some have suggested they should have, and started shooting at this shooter and we would have had a real shoot-out at the neighborhood theater?

COMMENT: So, Mr. Kopel, why would just reporting large ammunition sales infringe on anyone's rights? It would just alert law enforcement of a potential risk and give them an opportunity to take a close look at the purchaser

As to Rep. Schakowsky's comment, ABSOLUTELY correct.

NRA's Rule #1


Tuesday, October 24, 2006

POLITICS - Guns In America

"Gun violence: An American way of death" by BERND DEBUSMANN, Capital Hill Blue

It's an American way of death. More than 30,000 people die from gunshot wounds every year, through murder, suicide and accidents.

That is an average of 82 a day, and prospects for reducing the toll are dim.

The debate between gun control advocates and the pro-gun lobby was reignited briefly this month by four school shootings between September 26 and October 9.

In one, a man carrying a pistol, a shotgun and 600 rounds of ammunition shot 10 girls execution-style at an Amish school in Pennsylvania, killing five of them, and then killed himself. In another, a 13-year-old took an AK-47 assault rifle to his school in Missouri, pointed it at administrators and other students and fired it into a ceiling.

At a hastily arranged White House Conference on School Safety on October 10, panelists covered topics ranging from metal detectors and school bullies to the value of religious beliefs and good communication between parents and schools.

But the word "gun" was not mentioned until a plucky teenager pointed out to a panel moderated by Attorney General Alberto Gonzales that the common factor was easy access to high-powered firearms. President George W. Bush and his wife Laura Bush attended separate parts of the conference but avoided mention of guns.

...bold emphasis mine.... and....

"The U.S. level of lethal violence is far out of line with those of other industrialized nations," said David Hemenway, director of the Harvard Injury Control Research Center. "The fact that most of our lethal violence involves firearms lends credence to the hypothesis that the prevalence of guns is a prime reason."

That hypothesis, widely accepted in much of the rest of the world, is hotly contested by American advocates of unfettered access to guns, led by the National Rifle Association (NRA), who say that the second amendment to the Constitution gives all law-abiding citizens the right to bear arms.

Proponents of tighter gun controls see things differently. "Congress has been in denial about gun violence ... and is moving in the wrong direction," said Joshua Horwitz, the executive director of the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence. He noted that the annual death toll from gun violence in the United States is ten times the total of U.S. combat deaths, to date, in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Statisticians say such comparisons are misleading but the parallel has been drawn before, most notably by then president George H.W. Bush, the present president's father, after the end of the first Gulf War.

  • "During the first three days of the ground offensive, more Americans were killed in some American cities than at the entire Kuwaiti front," Bush said at the time.

    "Think of it, one of our brave National Guardsmen may have actually been safer in the midst of the largest armored offensive in history than he would have been on the streets of his home-town."


That was in 1991, when the U.S. murder rate, driven by turf wars between crack dealers, reached an all-time peak of 24,700, according to FBI statistics. It declined steadily in the 1990s and stood at just under 17,000 last year. Guns accounted for two thirds of the killings.

I am also coming to agree that access to high-powered guns is a big problem. We are not talking hunting rifles here. We, the American people and especially the NRA really need to reexamine our stance on high-powered guns. Is the risk to our children and communities really worth NOT putting some limits on the type of guns are allowed on our streets?

Is the right to bear arms really unlimited, or is it like "free speech" where there are recognized limits?