Showing posts with label gop. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gop. Show all posts

Friday, January 15, 2021

THE GOP - Republicans Need to Fess-Up


IMO:  While I agree with the sentiment of this article, it fails to take into account that Republicans have been infected with greed for power and Trump gave them a way to do that.  The GOP will not change until they put America and our Constitution ahead of the party.

"Republicans need to show voters how badly Trump led them astray" by Henry Olsen, The Washington Post 1/14/2021

Republicans who want to move the party forward after impeachment will have to confront the election fraud myth that sparked the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.  That will require courage, because Republican voters have been fed a steady diet of lies and untruths about the vote since Election Day.  Tackling the issue head-on, however, will both show moderate Americans that Republicans love democracy and highlight to rank-and-file GOP voters how badly President Trump led them astray.

For months, the typical Republican has been steadily hearing that the election was stolen.  Few can probably recite specific facts to support that claim, but they know that people they trust, from Trump to his lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani to conservative media personalities, say this happened.  For many, liberals and Democrats are the only people they have heard say otherwise.  Naturally, they believe the people they trust over the ones they don’t.

Combating this means Republican officials must take to the conservative media to aggressively push back.  That, in turn, will mean confronting each of the voter fraud myths head-on, armed with clear and persuasive evidence.  The facts are there to support them, but they need to be aware of what the Trump propaganda machine has been spewing to make the case.

The fraud arguments fall roughly into three categories.  The first is that mail-in ballots — regardless of whether they were solicited by the voter or sent unsolicited by election officials — were misused to cast fraudulent votes for Joe Biden.  Specifically, it’s alleged that many states did not rigorously match signatures on the ballot envelopes to those on a voter’s registration card, thereby allowing votes cast by fraudsters to get into the mix.  It’s true that some states have lower rates of ballot rejection from mail ballots than they have in the past, but that could be due to a number of circumstances — the most important being that so many more people used mail ballots in 2020 than previously.  In any event, even applying prior rejection rates to the total of mail ballots cast in 2020 would not have changed the result of the election.  Biden’s margin in virtually every swing state far exceeds the number of votes that theoretically could have been disqualified under this fraud myth’s contention.

The second pro-fraud argument is that election officials in selected cities stuffed the ballot box during election-night counting.  The only evidence given to try to back this allegation are the alleged absence of GOP vote monitors in some locations and the videotape that supposedly shows an election worker in Fulton County, Ga., finding a stack of ballots under a table once GOP monitors were gone.  Neither allegation holds up under close scrutiny.

None of the counts produced by the supposedly fraudulent vote counters in Democratic (and usually Black-dominated) cities are inconsistent with those produced in prior elections.  Moreover, precinct data from large cities around the country show the same trends as those in the cities labeled as fraudulent by Trump.  This strongly suggests that the vote counts in the targeted cities were accurate, regardless of the presence of GOP monitors, unless one wants to believe that every single election authority in the country was in on the steal.  The Fulton County videotape is also easily explicable, as Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger has argued and Georgia law enforcement has found.

Finally, the claim that Dominion voting machines switched votes from Trump to Biden is also laughably easy to dismiss.  Dominion produces a number of machines, and the ones most commonly in use are ballot preparation machines and counting machines.  Ballot preparation machines record a voter’s choices and print the actual ballot.  If the alleged switching occurred then, the voter could have spotted it and protested, which would lead to him or her getting a new ballot.  Vote-counting machines are checked after the election during the canvassing period, when randomly selected precincts are hand-counted to match the hand counts to the machine counts.  Again, unless everyone, including the Republican Party canvassers, are in on the steal, machine count fraud would be caught.  Indeed, an analysis of Michigan’s county returns by the conservative election website RRH Elections ["Candidates, Elections, and Politics from the Right Perspective"] found no difference between counties that used Dominion machines and those that did not.

Republican officials who aggressively make this case will slowly but surely change Republican voters’ minds.  Once that happens, the people whose minds have changed will understand that they were duped by the man they trusted.  Once burned, twice shy — these people will never fall for Trump’s lies again.  That turn of mind is essential to taking the party back from the brink and preparing it for future election victories.



Monday, October 17, 2016

ELECTION 2016 - The Once Great GOP

Sadly, the GOP is in the midst of a torturous death.  Thanks to Trump and his mob, the GOP allowing the 'Tea Party' to hijack their agenda, and the unwillingness to change there dogma, they are fracturing and sinking.  They refuse to learn or change.

ALSO:  Note Bill Maher's comments (my previous post) on Trump supports and the atmosphere of 2016 politics.

PS:  I voted last Friday 10/14/2016, by mail (which is the better way to vote).


This is a partial consolidation post on the GOP and Trump for this week:

"Ryan won't campaign for Trump; Clinton widens lead in polls" PBS NewsHour 10/10/2016

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  Speaker of the House Paul Ryan says he will no longer defend or campaign for Donald Trump.  The announcement comes three days after The Washington Post released a 2005 video in which Trump uses vulgar language to describe his treatment of women.  Meanwhile, a new NBC poll out Monday shows Hillary Clinton's lead growing, at 46 percent to Trump's 35 percent in a four-way race.  Lisa Desjardins reports.



"Is the Republican rupture irreconcilable?" PBS NewsHour 10/10/2016

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  Numerous Republican leaders have rescinded their support for Donald Trump since the release of a 2005 tape in which he makes sexually aggressive comments about women.  On Monday, Speaker of the House Paul Ryan announced he would no longer defend or campaign with the nominee.  John Yang speaks with former Trump campaign adviser Barry Bennett and former Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.) about the party's divide.



"Trump attacks Republicans as Clinton campaigns with Gore" PBS NewsHour 10/11/2016

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  The Republican party's civil war raged on as Donald Trump took to his favorite social media platform.  Trump tweeted a slew of critical comments about Speaker of the House Paul Ryan.  In Pennsylvania, he doubled down on the threat to jail Hillary Clinton if he is elected.  Meanwhile, Clinton was in Miami with Al Gore, a man who knows the importance of each Florida vote.  Lisa Desjardins reports.



"Trump campaigns in Florida, fighting to keep GOP support" PBS NewsHour 10/13/2016

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  Donald Trump kept his focus on Florida, a state he badly needs in order to become president.  Meanwhile, running mate Mike Pence urged conservative Christians in Virginia to stand by the ticket despite recent high-profile Republican defections.  Hillary Clinton campaigned in Colorado, another battleground state, trying to build on her lead in most national polls.  Judy Woodruff reports.



"Trump claims new allegations are part of a conspiracy orchestrated by Clintons" PBS NewsHour 10/10/2016

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  Donald Trump was at his most defiant and direct at a rally in Palm Beach, Florida, where he denied new allegations of sexual misconduct and insisted he is the target of a smear campaign.  Meanwhile, first lady Michelle Obama campaigned for Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire, delivering an impassioned response to the unprecedented campaign drama.  Lisa Desjardins reports.



"Why the Trump allegations are consuming campaign coverage" PBS NewsHour 10/13/2016

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  Donald Trump says a new story by The New York Times about two women claiming the Republican presidential candidate sexually assaulted them is a lie.  Judy Woodruff gets reaction to the latest developments in the presidential campaign from Carolyn Ryan of The New York Times, David Maraniss of The Washington Post, and presidential historian Jon Meacham.



"Why this entrepreneur is treating Trump like a schoolyard bully" PBS NewsHour 10/13/2016

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman is the rare high-tech billionaire who is defying Donald Trump publicly.  He's even bankrolled a snarky parlor game that mocks the Republican presidential candidate mercilessly.  Economics correspondent Paul Solman talks with Hoffman about why he's stepping up despite possible retaliation.

Thursday, November 06, 2014

OPINION - Congrats GOP

"Congrats, GOP:  You just won control of Congress with a Democratic President" from The Jed Report, Daily Kos 11/5/2014

An open letter to Mitch McConnell, John Boehner, and their crew, from yours truly:

Dear Republicans:

Congratulations.  You just took control of Congress for the next two years.  It must feel great.  You should celebrate now, because pretty soon you're going to realize it's going to be an agonizingly long two years—as long as Democrats follow these three simple pieces of advice:

  1. Now that Republicans control the Senate and the House, they need to supply the votes for everything—no more bailouts from the Democratic caucus, bailouts that made sense when Democrats controlled one of the chambers.
  2. The President should wield the veto liberally, vetoing every measure to come from Congress that would undermine things like Obamacare or damage the government's ability to deliver the services the country expects from it—and congressional Democrats should support his vetoes.
  3. The President should take executive action wherever he can, within the constraints of the law, to accomplish goals like creating a humane immigration policy and dealing with climate change. If the Republicans don't like it, they can impeach him.

Again, congratulations guys.  You've achieved the goal that Mitch McConnell set out for you, and you did it by systematically trying to prevent Democrats from implementing progressive policies.  Just keep in mind that turnabout is fair play, and if Democrats are smart, that's exactly what's going to happen.

Best regards,
Jed

I'm not trying to sugarcoat the GOP's win.  It does suck, especially for nominations.  And it sucks that we're not going to get any new progressive laws passed, though it's not like we would have gotten any with a Republican House.  But—at the risk of repeating myself—the President is still the President is still the President is still the President.  Obamacare isn't going anywhere.  He can still take executive action to get a limited amount of things done.  And just about the only two things Republicans can do without the President's signature is shutting down the government and impeaching him.  And unless the GOP magically reinvents itself into a rational governing party, that's exactly what Democrats should let them do.  2016 will be here soon enough.

Thursday, April 03, 2014

POLITICS - Reactions to Supreme Court's Decision to Allow More Election Corruption

The Republicans love this decision because Republicans are already wholly owned by the rich.

"Debating how the court’s campaign finance decision affects the influence of money on American politics" PBS NewsHour 4/2/2014

Excerpt

JUDY WOODRUFF (NewsHour):  So, reaction to the court’s decision was, as you can imagine, swift.  Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer of New York said it — quote — “turned back the clock on our democracy.”  House Speaker John Boehner hailed it as a victory for the First Amendment.

REP. JOHN BOEHNER, R, Ohio, Speaker of the House:  What I think this means is that freedom of speech is being upheld.  You all have the freedom to write what you want to write.  Donors ought to have the freedom to give what they want to give.

SEN. CHARLES SCHUMER, D, N.Y.:  The very wealthy should be allowed to participate in the system, but most people would agree, if you did a balancing test, already their weight is disproportionate, and this makes it more so.

JUDY WOODRUFF:  Hari Sreenivasan (NewsHour) in our New York studio gets more reaction now.



Thursday, October 31, 2013

POLITICS - Future of the GOP, Sen. Mitch McConnell

More from the Gopians in the alternate universe....

"Sen. Mitch McConnell:  I don't think anybody can make the health reform law work" PBS Newshour 10/30/2013

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., believes the problems with the Affordable Care Act implementation extends beyond the website's technical troubles.  Gwen Ifill sits down with Sen. McConnell to discuss his criticism of the ACA, his take on NSA spying allegations and which common causes unite the GOP factions.

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

POLITICS - Future of the GOP, From Tim Huelskamp (R-Kan)

"Rep. Huelskamp:  Tea party GOP lost the shutdown battle, but not the wider debate" PBS Newshour 10/22/2013

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  Rep. Tim Huelskamp, R-Kan., believes that Americans are disappointed with the "status quo" deal Congress passed to end the shutdown.  Judy Woodruff talks to the congressman about Republican strategy and rhetoric, another conversation in our series on the future direction of the GOP.

WRONG!  Most Americans are disappointed with a party whose policies lead to non-governance.  Putting party dogma before actually doing the nation's business.

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

POLITICS - Future of the GOP, From Former Senator Trent Lott (R-Miss)

For the Republican Party to HAVE a future they fist have to dump Tea Party members.

If Tea Party members want to do 'their thing' then they should form their own national political party.

"Former Sen. Trent Lott:  Republicans should pivot towards a positive agenda" PBS Newshour 10/21/2013

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  Former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss., believes the tactics used by Republicans during the shutdown were "not wise."  Lott joins Judy Woodruff to begin a series of conversations about the future of the GOP.  They discuss the importance of getting work done and what issues could help reunite the party.

JUDY WOODRUFF (Newshour):  We turn now to politics and the fallout from the 16-day government shutdown.

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

IMMIGRATION - U.S. House Plan to Block Comprehensive Reform

"Rep. Gowdy:  Provide Immigration 'Tripod of Security' Before Other Reform Aspects" PBS Newshour 7/9/2013

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  House Speaker John Boehner says he prefers a step-by-step approach to immigration reform, rather than the comprehensive Senate bill that includes a path to citizenship.  What options are being considered by the Republican-led House?  Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., joins Ray Suarez to discuss his priorities for reform.

Read "step-by-step approach" as "no comprehensive reform."  The GOP just hates immigrants, especially Hispanic.


Wednesday, May 08, 2013

POLITICS - Latest GOP Rebranding Effort

"House GOP takes a new message to 'mommy blogs'" by Steve Benen, Maddow Blog 5/7/2013

Republicans have struggled with a gender gap for quite a while, but in 2011 and 2012, the problem intensified. Indeed, the phrase "Republican war on women" did not materialize out of thin air.

In a short period of time, we saw GOP officials restricting contraception; cutting off Planned Parenthood; requiring state-mandated, medically-unnecessary transvaginal ultrasounds; forcing physicians to lie to patients about abortion and breast cancer; fighting equal-pay laws; and temporarily defeating the Violence Against Women Act.  When it came time for House Republicans to pay for lower student loan interest rates, GOP officials decided to get the funding by cutting access to breast cancer and cervical cancer screenings.

But that was before.  USA Today reported last week that the party has a new idea, included in House Majority Leader Eric Cantor's (R-Va.) rebranding campaign, it hopes will resonate with some of the women who ran away from the party in recent years.

House Republicans are targeting popular "mommy blog" websites in a digital ad campaign beginning Tuesday as part of an ongoing effort to repair the GOP's image with certain voting blocs -- in this case swing female voters -- who have sided decisively with Democrats in recent elections.

The banner ads will be featured on over 100 websites popular among women and geo-targeted to be viewed by residents in 20 Democratic-held congressional districts targeted by the GOP for 2014.... The $20,000 ad buy, running on sites including Ikeafans.com and MarthaStewart.com through Friday, will call on Democrats to vote with House Republicans next week on a bill to give hourly private sector workers more flexibility to choose between compensatory time and cash payment for overtime work.

Yes, the rebranded, new-and-improved Republican Party thinks private-sector flex time is the key -- or at least, a key -- to closing the gender gap.

There are, of course, a couple of problems.  For one thing, this is a pretty modest policy step, which doesn't come close to compensating for the rest of the GOP's regressive social agenda.

For another, the proposal itself isn't any good.

The basic idea behind the "Working Families Flexibility Act" is empowering private-sector employers to make a trade with workers -- instead of giving employees overtime pay for extra work, businesses can compensate workers with some additional time off.

If this sounds familiar, it's because the new Republican idea isn't new at all -- Alex Seitz-Wald noted that House GOP leaders pushed identical measures in 1996, 1997, and 2003, and it was a favorite measure of Newt Gingrich's.

OK, but what are the substantive downsides?  Seitz-Wald explained:

What labor advocates are more concerned about is that the bill supposedly aimed at helping working families might actually hurt them by undermining the 40-hour work week and “increasing overtime hours for those who don’t want them and cutting pay for those who do,” as Center for Economic and Policy Research economist Eileen Appelbaum wrote.  The National Partnership for Women and Families said the “mis-named Working Families Flexibility Act will mean a pay cut for workers without any guaranteed flexibility or time off.” [...]

In Cantor’s “Making Life Work” speech in February, he explained that, “In 1985, Congress passed a law that gave state and municipal employees this flexibility, but today still denies that same privilege to the entire private sector.  That’s not right.”  But that move was to cut costs for government, not provide workers with more freedom, Judith Lichtman of the National Partnership for Women And Families told the AP.  And government employees generally have the protection of both a union and civil service laws.

And as Ezra Klein noted, if the problem is that working parents don’t have enough free time with their kids, then why not give them more by guaranteeing paid vacation days to employees?  The U.S. is the only developed country that doesn’t have a law ensuring all workers get vacations, thanks to fervent opposition from Republicans and corporate interests.  “Instead, Cantor is saying that the way to solve the problem of working parents not having enough time with their kids is to give them an incentive to work more overtime,” Klein wrote.

The House is likely to pass the bill sometime this week, though it almost certainly won't become law, at least not anytime soon -- the White House issued a formal veto threat yesterday.

Monday, January 28, 2013

POLITICS - Republicans Shoot-Down Their Own for Compromising

Another story of the once GOP, which no longer exists, they are now the Tea Party in all but name.

"Another Senator Announces Retirement Blaming 'Legislative Gridlock'" by Greg Henderson, NPR 1/25/2013

Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., won't seek re-election next year, he announced Friday.

The conservative Capitol Hill veteran faced recent criticism from the right for seeking a bipartisan compromise on deficit issues, and for being among the first high-level Republicans to question fidelity to Grover Norquist's no-new-taxes pledge after the November elections.

Those stances had raised speculation about a possible Tea Party-backed GOP primary challenge next year, when Chambliss would have been seeking a third six-year term.

In announcing his decision, Chambliss cited Washington dysfunction, not political fear, as his motivation:

"Lest anyone think this decision is about a primary challenge, I have no doubt that had I decided to be a candidate, I would have won re-election," Chambliss said in a statement. "In these difficult political times, I am fortunate to have actually broadened my support around the state and the nation due to the stances I have taken."

"Instead, this is about frustration, both at a lack of leadership from the White House and at the dearth of meaningful action from Congress, especially on issues that are the foundation of our nation's economic health. The debt-ceiling debacle of 2011 and the recent fiscal-cliff vote showed Congress at its worst and, sadly, I don't see the legislative gridlock and partisan posturing improving anytime soon. For our nation to be strong, for our country to prosper, we cannot continue to play politics with the American economy."

The rationale echoed that of a more moderate Republican senator, Olympia Snowe of Maine, when she announced a year ago that she would not seek re-election in 2012.

The Atlanta Journal Constitution reported that at least two Republican members of the House, Paul Broun and Tom Price, "have been contemplating primary challenges to Chambliss."

It said the announcement "could also awaken Georgia Democrats from the torpor they've been in since losing the governor's office in 2002," and cited a statement from Guy Cecil, executive director of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee:

"'Georgia will now offer Democrats one of our best pick-up opportunities of the cycle. There are already several reports of the potential for a divisive primary that will push Republicans to the extreme right. Regardless, there's no question that the demographics of the state have changed and Democrats are gaining strength. This will be a top priority.'"

At the end of 2014, Chambliss will have served 20 years in Congress: 8 years in the House and 12 years in the Senate.

In 2011, he was part of the so-called "Gang of Six" senators that tried and failed to reach a bipartisan deficit-reduction deal acceptable to both parties in Congress and to President Obama. But by backing a comprehensive plan that — while cutting entitlements — also would have increased tax revenue, Chambliss dissatisfied some conservatives.

Looming Senate Battles

Democrats currently hold a 55-to-45 edge in the Senate, including two independents who caucus with Democrats.

But the imminent confirmation of Massachusetts' Democratic Sen. John Kerry to secretary of state will open up a special election this year in which recently ousted Republican Scott Brown could seek to dent that margin, should he run. Longtime Democratic Rep. Edward Markey is seeking the Democratic nomination.

In addition to 33 Senate races nationwide in 2014 for full terms, at least two states will hold special Senate elections to complete the terms of Hawaii Democrat Daniel Inouye, who died late last year and was replaced on an interim basis by Democrat Brian Schatz, and South Carolina Republican Jim DeMint who resigned to take over a think tank and was replaced on an interim basis by fellow Republican Tim Scott.

Another Senate veteran, West Virginia Democrat Jay Rockefeller, also has announced that he won't seek re-election in 2014, giving Republicans an opening in a state that has voted Republican in recent presidential races, but where the major statewide offices are held by Democrats.

Friday, January 18, 2013

POLITICS - Republican Leaders on Debt-Ceiling Issue

"GOP leaders moonwalk away from debt-ceiling Armageddon" by Jay Bookman, Atlanta Journal-Constitution 1/18/2013

Slowly, painfully, political reality has begun to dawn on Washington Republicans and their supporters: If they force a major battle over the debt ceiling — a battle that they have acted oh-so-eager to fight — they are guaranteed to lose, and to lose badly.

Such a battle would be fought against superior forces, and on ill-chosen ground. The president’s approval rating are consistently above 50 percent; Congress has an approval rating of 14 percent. While Republicans still hold the House majority, they lost seats in the 2012 election and acknowledge that they held onto the majority only because of gerrymandering. Majorities of Republican voters reject key proponents of the GOP agenda, including cuts to Social Security and Medicare. In fact, 63 percent of GOP voters say the congressional GOP is out of touch. (That’s a Rasmussen number, by the way.)

And according to a new AP poll, 80 percent of Americans say that refusing to raise the debt ceiling, as House and Senate Republicans have promised to do, would touch off a major economic crisis.

Under those circumstances, threatening to force that major economic crisis unless the president implements politically unpopular policies would be the act of a fool. And fools there no doubt be.

However, a handful of Republican senators have now publicly acknowledged that the party would lose and lose badly by threatening to shut down the government. U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan, chair of the House Budget Committee, warned his fellow GOP congressmen at a retreat yesterday that their strategy has to match their capability.

As Politico described his remarks:

“Ryan said Republicans need to come to grips with the fact that they are the only Republicans in power in Washington. In the closed legislative strategy session, he said the GOP should avoid over-promising and under-delivering, according to five sources present. Instead, House Republicans should work to control expectations about what they can extract from Obama, and then people will be pleased by the result.”

The usually bellicose Charles Krauthammer is also a bit of a bellwether. He has been egging the Republicans on for weeks now, pushing them to do battle. (”If we all cliff-dive, Obama gets to preside over yet another recession. It will wreck his second term… You think he wants a second term with a double-dip recession, 9 percent unemployment and a totally gridlocked Congress? Republicans have to stop playing as if they have no cards.”)

Now, even Krauthammer wants to back down from a fight that he suddenly sees can only end badly. “The party establishment,” he writes, “is coming around to the view that if you try to govern from one house — e.g., force spending cuts with cliffhanging brinkmanship — you lose. You not only don’t get the cuts. You get the blame for rattled markets and economic uncertainty. You get humiliated by having to cave in the end. And you get opinion polls ranking you below head lice and colonoscopies in popularity.”

What’s going on here? Why this sudden outburst of strategic sanity? I think the great Samuel Johnson put it best:

“Depend upon it, sir, when a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight, it concentrates his mind wonderfully.”

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

POLITICS - GOP U.S. House Leadership Fight

"Congress Resumes With a G.O.P. Leadership Fight" by JONATHAN WEISMAN, New York Times 11/13/2012

Excerpt

The battle to shape the Republican Party’s direction after its electoral losses will see its first skirmish in the Capitol on Wednesday in a House leadership fight in which the profile might be low but the symbolism is high.

The House’s Republican leaders would dearly like to elevate Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers of Washington to lead the House Republican Conference, putting a female face into the pantheon of the white male Republican leaders. But standing in their way is Representative Tom Price of Georgia, one of the most conservative members of the House, who has lined up some big guns in his quest for the fourth-ranking post in the House Republican conference.

The most important of those guns, Representative Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin, the defeated Republican vice-presidential nominee, showed no sign of retreat Tuesday in a letter sent to colleagues endorsing Mr. Price.

“In the House of Representatives, we have an obligation and a real opportunity to produce and promote a positive and principled agenda for the American people,” Mr. Ryan wrote. “Over the past two years, we have offered bold solutions to our fiscal and economic challenges. We must not let up.”

The McMorris Rodgers-Price clash could set the tone for the coming Congress. Lawmakers arrived Tuesday for the lame-duck session amid an atmosphere unsettled by Democratic victories. Democrats were giddy as children on the first day of school. Republicans vacillated between notes of contrition and defiance. And the shape of the 113th Congress is only starting to come into focus.

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

POLITICS - Another Opinion on Paul Ryan

"Who Is Paul Ryan?" by David Sirota, In These Times 8/17/2012

The media’s image of Romney’s running mate doesn’t mesh with reality

Wisconsin congressman Paul Ryan admires Ayn Rand, and if you believe Republican Party mythology, Ryan is a messianic John Galt who will save America from a secret socialist conspiracy. Thus, in Rand fashion, it's worth asking: Who Is Paul Ryan?

The answer is simple: the GOP's presumptive vice presidential nominee is the 21st century's flesh-and-blood embodiment of political deception and media obfuscation.

Purporting to be a small-government budget hawk, Ryan publicly decries corporate welfare and says he wants “to get Washington out of the business of picking winners and losers.” This has generated press coverage promoting Ryan as a great fiscal conservative. Yet, written out of the story is the fact that Ryan is a Huge Government Republican who voted for–and in some cases, still defends–the biggest examples of corporate welfare in American history.

Ryan, you see, was the Huge Government Republican who backed this era's massive corporate bailouts–the one that picked politically connected companies as winners and taxpayers as losers. He was the Huge Government Republican who regularly voted for profligate war spending bills–the ones that blew a gaping hole in the federal budget. And he is the Huge Government Republican now using his committee chairmanship to oppose serious cuts to the deficit-exploding corporate welfare still embedded in the bloated Pentagon budget.

Similarly, Ryan claims to be, and is billed in the press as, a libertarian-inspired acolyte of Rand–a man who supposedly values freedom and limited government. But as a Huge Government Republican, he has consistently voted to expand the surveillance state, endorse warrantless wiretapping and permit indefinite detention. Oh, and in contradiction to Rand's writings, he has also pushed to use the power of Huge Government to end a woman's right to choose an abortion.

Like so many Republicans, Ryan genuflects to the private sector and insinuates that the government is not a job creator. It's funny coming from a guy who has spent most of his adult life as a federal employee and whose family's construction company brags of building its fortune off government highway contracts.

Ryan labels himself an opponent of “crony capitalism” and is often promoted by reporters as someone who can help Mitt Romney thwart the Washington insiders who corrupt our politics. Somehow, we are expected to ignore the fact that Ryan has spent the vast majority of his adult life in Washington; that his wife served as a top pharmaceutical and oil lobbyist in Washington; and that, as Newsweek reported in 2011, he tried to insert special provisions into federal law that would boost his personal oil investment portfolio.

Then there are Ryan's budget proposals, whose central premises are that Medicare must be gutted and Social Security must be turned over to Wall Street because we allegedly don't have enough revenue to fund them. In response, the press often credits Ryan's blueprint for being courageous and honest. Yet, in the very same plans, Ryan proposes to severely deplete public revenues by eliminating all taxes on capital gains, interest and dividends, meaning that, according to The Atlantic magazine, Mitt Romney would pay a 0.82 percent tax rate on his $21 million annual earnings.

Republican powerbrokers, of course, hope you never learn any of this. They hope you and an obsequious press don't bother to review Ryan's congressional votes or his legislative history. They are hoping, in other words, that when you see Ryan's boyish Midwestern visage, you won't see the real Ryan–and you won't see what his ascent to vice president might mean for the future of America.

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

POLITICS - Bribery? GOP Money

"Did GOP Money Man Sheldon Adelson Violate Bribery Law?" PBS Newshour 7/16/2012

Excerpt

SUMMARY: One of the largest Republican donors in the 2012 election, gambling magnate Sheldon Adelson, is now under investigation for violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, an anti-bribery law. Ray Suarez discusses the charges against Adelson with ProPublica managing editor Stephen Engelberg.

JEFFREY BROWN (Newshour): And to our second money and politics story, this focused on an investigation of a leading Republican donor.

Ray Suarez has the story.

RAY SUAREZ (Newshour): You may not know him by name, but gambling magnate Sheldon Adelson is one of the largest Republican donors in the 2012 election.

Adelson and members of his family are reported to have given more than $20 million to GOP-leaning super PACs, including some backing Newt Gingrich during the primary. Now Adelson is donating to the Restore Our Future super PAC. That group supports Mitt Romney and collected $20 million in June, a record month for a super PAC.

A new investigation finds Adelson may have violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act by paying a Macau lawyer hundreds of thousands of dollars, all in a bid to get approval for his projects in Macau, a special administrative region in China. Billions in profits were on the line.

China bans casino gambling in the rest of the country. The story was filed by "Frontline," ProPublica and the investigative reporting -- investigative reporting program at the University of California.