Showing posts with label President Trump. Show all posts
Showing posts with label President Trump. Show all posts

Monday, March 22, 2021

OPINION - Brooks and Capehart 3/19/2021

"Brooks and Capehart on COVID vaccine hesitancy and the Georgia attacks" PBS NewsHour 3/19/2021

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  New York Times columnist David Brooks and Washington Post columnist Jonathan Capehart join Judy Woodruff to discuss the week in politics, including Republican reluctance to get the COVID-19 vaccine, the response to violence against Asian Americans and the Atlanta attacks, and the Biden administration's immigration policy.

Judy Woodruff (NewsHour):  And to maybe help us further understand the vaccine hesitancy among some Republicans, and much more, we turn now to the analysis of Brooks and Capehart.

That is New York Times columnist David Brooks, and Jonathan Capehart, columnist for The Washington Post.

So good to see both of you, smiling faces, on this Friday night.

(LAUGHTER)

Jonathan Capehart, Washington Post:  Good to see you, Judy.

Judy Woodruff:  But serious stuff to talk about.

Thank you for being here.

Jonathan, I'm going to start with you.

Why do you think so many Republicans, 40, 50 percent, are saying they don't want the vaccine?  And what do you think the prospects are for changing their mind?

Jonathan Capehart:  Well, Judy, I think part of the problem is the previous President spent the entirety of the pandemic — so, a year ago, we were hearing the President of the United States casting doubt, one, on whether the virus would come to the United States, and then, two, once it did get to the United States, calling the whole thing a hoax every day.

And so, if you were a die-hard follower of the President, and you're listening to him telling you all sorts of falsehoods, lies, misinformation about a pandemic that you also say is a hoax, then it doesn't surprise me — it is shocking just as an American and someone who believes in science — that so many, such a high percentage of Republicans, and particularly Republicans who supported Donald Trump, being very hesitant about taking the vaccine.

I hope that the gentleman in Yamiche's package will do what he says he's going to do, educate himself, and then decide to take the vaccine.  That is all Dr. Fauci has been trying to do, folks at the CDC, the NIH, trying to educate the American people and tell them, this is how we protect ourselves against this virus and this pandemic, and these are the things we must do if we want to get to the other side and start to live what we used to call normal lives again.

Judy Woodruff:  David, how do you explain the thinking on the part of so many Republicans?

David Brooks, New York Times:  Well, for generations, if you asked Americans, do you trust the institutions of our society, you would get 70 or 80 percent trusting institutions.

Then, starting around the time of Vietnam and Watergate, that began to decline.  And now it is about 19 percent.  And so people have built up over decades of what they perceive as failure and betrayal a sense of distrust, not only in government, in Congress, but in science and in institutions.

And it is especially true on the Republican side, where the "don't tread on me" ethos has been strongest.

I am hopeful that, once you detach this from politics and make it a local issue, where it is you and your doctor, or you and your neighbor, or you and your pastor, that minds can change.  People really do think on two different levels.

They think — if you ask them a political question in a poll, they will give you a political answer.  But if it is the doctor saying, you know, everybody around here is taking this test — or this vaccine, it looks pretty good, it is keeping us safe, I think then, once it becomes a local issue, and not a political issue, I think minds can change pretty fast.

And we still have that in the Frank Luntz focus group, that he said elsewhere that he really couldn't persuade people.  And the Biden administration is working hard to do that, really reaching out to Republicans.  Francis Collins, who is head of to NIH and an evangelical Christian, is talking to Christian groups.

And so they are broadening the messengers.

Judy Woodruff:  And, Jonathan, they are trying to change minds in that regard.

The President also out this week, in fact, today, marking the fact that 100 million Americans have had at least one vaccination now.  And it is, what, just two months into his administration.  He also is out around the country talking up the benefits of this COVID economic relief plan.

And he was going to be in Atlanta to talk about that, but, today, the triples became an opportunity to speak to the Asian American community there, just a few days after these terrible shootings at three spas in the Atlanta area.

Jonathan, what is the right message right now for the President at a time like this?

Jonathan Capehart:  Well, I think, in the remarks that the President gave just before we came on air, just as you were coming on air, are similar to the messages he has been giving when it comes to talking about the loss Americans have felt as a result of the pandemic.

In his remarks in Atlanta, he targeted them to the Asian American, Pacific Islander community that feels and has felt under siege, under threat for more than a year because of the rhetoric that was coming out of the White House.

And so by an accident of timing and coincidence, the President and vice President were already going to be in Georgia, in Atlanta to tout the American Rescue Plan.  But the fact that these — that the shootings happened, the murders happened, that their trip took a more mournful purpose.

But there is one other thing to keep in mind here, Judy.  Georgia flipped from red to blue.  And Senators Warnock and Ossoff are in the Senate because people came out and voted for them.  And we know that, because of a big turn without from Asian Americans in Georgia, that helped put Joe Biden over the top in Georgia and Warnock and Ossoff over the top in, I believe, both of their races, the general election race and the run-off races.

And so this trip that President Biden and Vice President Harris took today and is still ongoing has taken on so many layers of meaning that we can't even get into right now.

Judy Woodruff:  And pick up on that, David.

I mean, at a moment like this, how much difference can it make what a President says, especially on this — as Jonathan said, this is a subject that has political — certainly, political ramifications.

David Brooks:  Well, one of the things we certainly learned in recent history is that the presidency is the cultural determiner of the country, and that the ethos of the country reflects the presidency for good or ill, whether it feels like you are walking into a hailstorm or you have got sunshine shining upon you.

And Biden ran on the soul of America.  I thought that was just a very important part of his campaign.  I wasn't clear how he was going to translate that into the presidency.  How do you actually use the power of the office to change the soul of America?  I actually thought he should have a little agency within the White House, thinking about the culture, thinking about what is the American soul, how do we tell our story, how do question keep ourselves together?

But events have certainly given him occasions to put that issue front and center, and mostly hate crimes and killings, unfortunately.  And so what this episode shows is, in the soul of America, there has been a rising tide of bigotry of all kinds, of racism, anti-Semitism, anti-Asian violence, rising tide of all kinds, partly because of Donald Trump, partly because of COVID, partly because there are, frankly, a lot of lonely young men who have been sort of cut loose from society and who are struggling.

And they are not enmeshed in thick communities.  And they do terrible things on occasion.

And so the soul of America is about our moral fiber, and not practicing bigotry.  It is about our social connection enmeshing people.  And then it is about expressing the values that we share, which I think President did today.

Judy Woodruff:  And this is not, Jonathan, of course, the only tough question facing the President right now.  There are more and more immigrants attempting to come into the United States across the Southern border.

Children and families with young children, the administration is letting them come in.  They are turning back single adults.  But it is adding up to a real challenge.  The Republicans are saying, this is Joe Biden's border crisis.

What do you make of his handling of this and also of the two immigration bills that passed the House this week?

Jonathan Capehart:  So, when it comes to Republican criticism of the Biden administration, I mean, that is par for the course.  That is to be expected, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy calling it Biden's border crisis.

But the waves of migrants coming to the border didn't start the moment Joe Biden became President.  They have been coming.  I think that President Biden talking about having a more humane immigration policy probably sent a message to folks who are trying get here through the Southern border that the draconian measures and sort of inhumane measures taken by Donald Trump were no longer going to be in force and that maybe it's time to go, also keeping in mind that it's not just — President Biden isn't the only reason why folks are trying to get across the Southern border.

People are fleeing.  They're fleeing terror and gangs and crime and lack of economic opportunities in their own countries.  And they're moving north, seeking opportunities.

Now, what we have seen, Judy, is that the administration has gone from the President saying we want a more humane policy to the President going on television earlier this week and saying, don't come.  You have got the secretary of homeland security saying, don't come now.  You have got the new ambassador for the border, Roberta Jacobson, saying, don't come, and don't come this way.  Come through legal means.

So, I think, if anything, the Biden administration has to has to land on a consistent message.  And then it's got to figure out a way to work with Congress to really get a handle on what to do about immigration.

The two bills that you mentioned, Judy, one dealing with the Dreamers and another one dealing with migrant farmworkers, it's not comprehensive immigration reform policy.  But these are two big pieces of the immigration puzzle that are working their way through Congress.  They made it their way through the House.

But the tough part, as we will be discussing forever, it seems, the tough part is going to be in the Senate.  And will the Senate, will Congress actually work to pass something that will actually alleviate a lot of the immigration problems in the country?

Judy Woodruff:  What about that, David, and sizing up how President Biden's handling all this?

David Brooks:  Well, the short-term problem for the Biden administration is, they did have a very unclear message in the beginning and that says, don't come — you can come, but not yet, which is not a clear message, especially since it gets filtered through these smugglers, who smuggle people across the border for like 8,000 bucks.

Their incentive is to tell people, time to go, because they make money everybody they carry.  And so you get lots of misinformation spread across the border.  And a lot of people are coming.  We're at a 14-year high.

The larger problem is that we have just never had a well-funded asylum system.  We don't have the facilities, as it was painfully clear during the Trump years.  We don't have the judges.  And so people come, they get their hearing, but sometimes it takes over a year to get the hearing.

Meanwhile, they're in the country.  And if they think they're going to lose the hearing, which two-thirds do, then they don't show up.  And so it's just a dysfunctional system.

I think the Biden administration is trying to ramp up and fix it.  But who's to say they won't just continue to fall behind?  And the pain of that is, (A) we have some chaos on the border, but, (B) you get an awful political atmosphere for trying to pass immigration reform.

And asylum and immigration are different, which is worth remembering.  And so we have given up, I think wisely, on the idea of comprehensive reform.  Too big a lift.  But it's getting tougher to pass even these minor bills on things people sort of agree about, like the dreamers.

And the border counties in Texas shifted sharply to the Republicans.  Mark Kelly, the senator from Arizona, has got to run again in 2022.  If there's a lot of anti-immigrant sentiment, it becomes hard for him.

And so the — in a weird way, this border crisis is making the immigration bills a lot harder to pass.

Judy Woodruff:  Well, whether they wanted to deal with this right now or not, they are having to deal with it.  And we will continue to watch it.

Thank you both, David Brooks, Jonathan Capehart.

Jonathan Capehart:  Thanks, Judy.

David Brooks:  Thanks.



Monday, December 16, 2019

MISLEADING PUBLIC - Afghanistan War

"Explosive investigative report says U.S. government misled public on war in Afghanistan" PBS NewsHour 12/9/2019

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  In a blockbuster story representing the culmination of several years of investigation and pursuit of government documents, The Washington Post reports that U.S. officials have been misleading the American public about the war in Afghanistan for the past 18 years.  John Yang talks to The Washington Post’s Craig Whitlock, lead reporter on the story, about what the classified document trove revealed.




"During Afghan war, lack of U.S. knowledge yielded a flawed strategy" PBS NewsHour 12/10/2019

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  For nearly two decades, the United States’ military engagement in Afghanistan has been plagued by strategic missteps, according to The Washington Post's bombshell report.  The investigation examined thousands of pages of previously unpublished notes and interviews from the U.S. government’s Lessons Learned Project analyzing the war.  Nick Schifrin talks to retired Army Lt. Gen. Douglas Lute.



Monday, November 21, 2016

OPINION - Brooks and Marcus 11/18/2016

"Brooks and Marcus on why Trump's appointments make sense" PBS NewsHour 11/18/2016

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  As Donald Trump announces his choices for prominent roles in his upcoming administration, patterns are emerging.  New York Times columnist David Brooks and Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus join Judy Woodruff to analyze the newest appointments and the governing philosophy they represent, consider Trump's potential conflicts of interest and share remembrances of beloved colleague Gwen Ifill.

JUDY WOODRUFF (NewsHour):  And now to the analysis of Brooks and Marcus.  That's New York Times columnist David Brooks and Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus.  Mark Shields is away.

And happy Friday to both of you.

So, President-elect Trump, David, making these three big announcements today in the national security arena, after we heard who a couple of people are going to be around him in the White House.  What do we make of these choices, starting with the ones today?

DAVID BROOKS, New York Times:  Well, if you thought Donald Trump was going to be swallowed up by the conventional Republican Party or by Washington, you were wrong.

He's governing, it seems, exactly as he campaigned.  And the people he selected are very much in the spirit of the campaign, sometimes explicitly referencing the policies he took on the campaign.

So, I would say:
  • A) (aka First) They are going to be very different.  We're going to have a very different administration from a normal Republican administration, let alone a Democratic administration.
  • Second, I have to say, they have good resumes.  Pompeo, Flynn, they are — it's not like they're just out of the wilderness.  These are people who have been around power and who probably are not going to be automatically incompetent at their jobs.
  • The third thing to that we say is, they have Donald Trump's charm, which is to say they are extremely sharp-elbowed individuals, to a person.  And it's like he's taken all the hard bosses or bad bosses in the world, and so far, he is bringing them all together.
And so, if they work as a team, maybe they will be a very tough team, but they could work on each other.  And it could be hard to hire people under them, because these are people famous for being really hard on those around them.

JUDY WOODRUFF:  Ruth, what do you make of these national security picks?

RUTH MARCUS, Washington Post:  Disturbing on General Flynn, and less disturbing on Congressman Pompeo.

I think it's really important for us to understand Donald Trump is the president-elect, and he is really entitled to — he has got the prerogative to pick people who will implement his policies and who have his confidence.

But I think — I don't look at it just as the national security team.  I look at it as a whole, and I'm very worried that he is picking people — he talked on election night about the need to bind the wounds of division.  I think he's picking a series of people who are potentially pouring salt into the wounds of division and who are reinforcing some of his worst tendencies, rather than buttressing him and surrounding himself with people who bring to the table both personality and capabilities that he may be lacking in.

And so I would — the three that most concern me are General Flynn, Senator Sessions, and Steve Bannon at his right hand in the White House.

JUDY WOODRUFF:  Who comes from Breitbart News.

RUTH MARCUS:  Indeed.

TRUMP INC - Conflicts of Interest

"Many potential conflicts of interest await Trump presidency" PBS NewsHour 11/16/2016

IMHO:  There ARE conflicts of interest.

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  The Trump Organization's assets and arrangements span the globe.  As president, Donald Trump will have the authority to appoint people to make decisions that could affect his organization.  To discuss the potential conflicts the president-elect could face, John Yang speaks with Robert Weissman of Public Citizen and Susanne Craig of The New York Times.

JOHN YANG (NewsHour):  The Trump Organization has a variety of assets and arrangements that span the globe.  And, as President, Mr. Trump will have the authority to appoint people who will make decisions that affect those businesses.

Here to discuss the potential for conflict is Robert Weissman, president of nonprofit public interest group Public Citizen, and in New York, Susanne Craig, a New York Times reporter who has writing about this story.

Welcome to you both.

Susanne, let me start with you.

This is a very complicated story.  There are a lot of parts to president-elect Trump's business holdings.  But I think the easiest example is the Trump International Hotel here in Washington, D.C.  Walk us through the potential for conflicts with that hotel.

SUSANNE CRAIG, The New York Times:  It's really interesting.

This is a hotel that just opened, and it's been — it's been in progress for a few years, and it's on the site of the old post office, which is a government property.  And Donald Trump has a ground lease for 60 years, the Trump Organization, for 60 years, to run the hotel out of that.

So there's an arrangement between the federal government, an agency called the GSA, and the Trump Organization.  And the President has the power to appoint the head of the GSA.  So it's just this incredible situation where you have got a private company that will now be — that is owned by soon to be the President that will be negotiating with a government agency where the head of that agency is appointed by the President.

So just the potential there for conflict, you can just see it coming 100 miles away.  And the GSA is already saying they are preparing for it and they're looking at it.  Imagine that situation and multiply it by so many when you look at all the different things that could happen with the various companies that Donald Trump owns and the business interests that he has.

JOHN YANG:  And, also, Susanne, in that hotel are workers who might want to unionize.

SUSANNE CRAIG:  Who might want to unionize.

And this situation's actually been playing out in Las Vegas, where he co-owns a hotel in Las Vegas, and that hotel has — the workers there have tried to unionize, and the National Labor Relations Board, which has got presidential appointees on it, has actually — the board has ruled against Donald Trump even in the days before the election, so yet another example playing out in real time already where you have got conflict between the private — the private holdings and now government agencies that will have presidential appointees on them.