Showing posts with label American Military. Show all posts
Showing posts with label American Military. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 24, 2021

MILITARY.COM - Afghan War, Green Beret Ryan Hendrickson


"Afghanistan: The War That Made War Normal" by Stephen Losey, Military.com 8/23/2021

Green Beret Ryan Hendrickson didn't see any massive fireball from the improvised explosive device that nearly took his right leg during his first deployment to Afghanistan in 2010.

He didn't even really hear an explosion -- just a "pop" in his damaged ears.

But there was one thing he could hear, loud and clear, as he lay on the ground in a cloud of ammonia and with bones sticking out of his shattered leg: The Taliban, celebrating and congratulating one another over intercepted radio traffic, on what they thought was the death of an American soldier.

The memory of their laughter drove Hendrickson over the following 18 months, as he defied the odds to save his leg, recover both physically and emotionally, and then in 2012 return to Afghanistan for several more deployments, eventually earning a Silver Star.

"My mindset was, you bloodied me up, and you hurt me, but you didn't beat me," Hendrickson, who retired as a sergeant first class in 2020, said in an August interview.  "And I'm coming back."

Hendrickson was just one of many who experienced trauma, but he signed up to head back into a campaign still going years after his injury in what became a new normal -- 20 years of constant war.

The war in Afghanistan -- by far the longest in U.S. history -- is all but over, aside from the frantic evacuation of tens of thousands of Americans, Afghans and other civilians from the Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul.

But it has changed the U.S. military, in ways that will linger.  Those who saw the war up close -- including veterans of Afghanistan and current and retired generals and senior officials -- agree that the war didn't break the military.  But it did bend it, testing the men and women sent to fight, and the weapons and hardware they relied upon to survive in Afghanistan's harsh regions.

Retired Gen. Joe Votel, who headed both U.S. Special Operations Command and U.S. Central Command, saw "the fraying of the force" that resulted from the numerous deployments special operators shouldered.

After the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, continual war became a regular part of life for the military, even normalized, in a way it never had before -- or was meant to.  When death, trauma, family separations and other sufferings inherent to conflict became part of the day-to-day, the effects on the military extended to everything from family strife to physical and mental wounds.  In some rare cases, most notoriously Army Staff Sgt. Robert Bales' 2012 massacre of 16 Afghan civilians, that shift to the mundane included a blurring of morality and the lines separating the good guys from the bad.

It led the military to refine the ways it fights and resulted in unprecedented advancements in tactics, technology, medical treatments and equipment.

But it also took a significant toll on the force.  There were 2,448 U.S. service members killed in Afghanistan, and at least 20,722 wounded, some of whom will deal with those injuries for the rest of their lives.  For some of the troops who deployed, it led to trauma, struggles with mental health and moral injuries, and strained family lives.

That is a price the military has not yet fully reckoned with; it is still struggling to figure out how to do so.

"When you deploy people into continuous combat operations, they're going back to Afghanistan, or back to Iraq, or they've been there multiple times, sometimes they have a tendency to develop the attitude that, 'I have done this before, I know what I'm doing,'" Votel said.  "And so they become a little bit detached from the situation.  And that's where you begin to have some of these challenges.  People forget about the human aspect of this.  ...  They forget that they're dealing with people on the ground."

The act of taking a life, or firing weapons where civilians are nearby -- the sorts of moral decisions that can be incredibly difficult -- became normal.

"The things that aren't supposed to be routine, become routine, and then you begin to think of them as routine," Votel said.  "That's something you really have to guard against."

The Toll of the Conflict

The war exposed some of the military's vulnerabilities, including the alarming growth in deaths by suicide, which have claimed more than four times as many troops and veterans post-9/11 than actual combat -- and how special operators' long and repeated deployments affected them and their families.

In January 2020, in the wake of multiple troubling and embarrassing incidents, Special Operations Command released a "comprehensive review" of its force that concluded the community had grown a culture that prioritized deployments and getting the job done above all else, leading to an environment where ethical lapses could happen.

Votel said the Ranger Regiment dealt with this problem by more aggressively telling Rangers to "sit this one out."

It's often not easy for them to receive the message that they should skip a mission.

"That's why these people join; that's what they want to do," Votel said.

Russell Parker, a Marine Raider who repeatedly deployed to Afghanistan and retired as a lieutenant colonel in June, said there's no question deployments take a toll on families.  He was in Afghanistan nearly 11 years ago when his daughter was born, while a family friend was by his wife's side.  He met his daughter after he got home, but then left again on another deployment just after her third birthday -- and he said his deployment burdens were light compared to others he served with.

"If you're a guy or gal who's deployed every 12 or even 24 months, for six to 12 months, that's a whole lot of missed birthdays," Parker said.  "Which leads to a huge burden on the stay-at-home spouse.  ...  And either the family can absorb that, or over time, they decide we just can't [and] they have to move on without you."

It was the special operations community and the Air Force that were most consistently called upon to fight on Afghanistan's rocky, dusty terrain, and in the skies above.  The cost of that near-constant combat added up.

Aside from the initial invasion of Afghanistan and periodic surges, such as former President Barack Obama's surge that began in 2009 and relied heavily upon conventional forces, special operations troops bore the heaviest burden of the war, said Wesley Morgan, journalist and author of "The Hardest Place: The American Military Adrift in Afghanistan's Pech Valley."

The reliance on special operations forces in Afghanistan was, in many ways, a double-edged sword, Morgan said.  It dealt a significant amount of wear and tear on them, physically and mentally.

But Afghanistan was also a crucible for special operations, in which forces like the Rangers grew in size, responsibilities and capabilities.

The special operations force is "simply unrecognizable from what it was before," Morgan said.  "It's so much larger, its capabilities are so much greater.  Its combat experience is so much greater, by orders of magnitude, than anything that was there before.  And by the same token, of course, the wear and tear is greater as well."

Special operators were in Afghanistan practically constantly from 2001, training Afghan troops, building relationships with village leaders, and going on missions against everyone from the Taliban to al-Qaida to the Islamic State offshoot ISIS-Khorasan.

That "never say no" mindset carried a significant price, in deaths, woundings and the mental toll of deployment after deployment.

The military didn't see "complete, total meltdowns" in special operations organizations due to the high pace of deployments, Votel said -- partly because it recognized the stress it was placing on troops and took steps to better control deployments.

"Maybe we should have done that earlier, a little bit more effectively early on," Votel said.  "But I don't think we brought organizations to their knees."

For decades, the military culture had been reluctant at best to encourage troops to look after their mental health properly.  Parker said the tremendous mental health needs caused by the war in Afghanistan -- along with shifting generational attitudes toward mental health -- forced a sea change in how the military addresses it.

Programs such as Preservation of the Force and Families -- which brought psychologists, social workers and other mental health professionals into direct contact with special operators to help them deal with the pressures of deployment and the injuries they sustained -- helped, Parker said.

Now if someone is in trouble, he said, "it's all hands on deck.  I've got a military family life coordinator, I've got a social worker, I've got a psychologist, I've got a chaplain, I've got an MD -- pick a modality of treatment, and I've either got them sitting around the table with me to advise me on that person right now ... or I have the ability to reach out and find the discipline I need.

"We saved lives with that," Parker said.  "We literally arrested suicide[s], right before they happened by getting these reviews done."

War as Opportunity

Perpetual combat wore on both man and machine, but it also served as an unprecedented testing ground.  The conflict spurred extraordinary advancements in many elements of fighting war -- everything from tactics and technology, to how the military talks about and treats both mental health and physical wounds, which helped save Hendrickson's leg and allow him to return to the battlefield.

"I don't think there's any question that tactical-level, individual soldier, Marine, sailor, airman, skills are light years beyond where they were when I joined the Marine Corps in 1994," Parker said.  "The advances in equipment, the advances in capabilities, the advances in tactics, techniques and procedures ...  you almost can't discuss them in the same conversation."

Things like drones went from military afterthought to critical hardware.

"Look at drone technology and where we [were] in 2001, and where we've ended up," Votel said.  "You see more and more effort now, of people reaching out and really grabbing onto technology and helping them leverage our ability to pursue our national security objectives."

Over the years in Afghanistan, the Air Force refined its process for delivering airstrikes, with munitions guided to their targets by troops on the ground.  Scores of Air Force award citations since 2001 describe the heroism of airmen under heavy fire, simultaneously calling in airstrikes while firing back at Taliban or other foes, sometimes as they helped wounded teammates or while they themselves were injured.

Morgan said the growth of a generation of Army soldiers who came in shortly before or after 9/11, many of whom deployed repeatedly to Afghanistan, has resulted in a cadre of battle-tested leaders, the likes of which have not been seen since Vietnam.

"Afghanistan comes up over and over and over and over again," Morgan said.  "The sheer length of experience that certain parts of the Army, in particular light infantry units and the Rangers, have had in Afghanistan really means that for all of these senior leaders, for the infantry in particular, Afghanistan has been a formative experience at many points in their careers and lives.  ...  If you have stayed in the Army, you've done Afghanistan."

Hendrickson points to the considerable strides made in medical care -- particularly in treating trauma and saving severely damaged limbs -- that resulted from the war, and saved his own leg.

After his teammates rescued him -- and after hearing the Taliban's rejoicing at his wounding -- Hendrickson flew to the hospital at Landstuhl Air Base in Germany.

When they transferred him to Brooke Army Medical Center in Texas, he was warned he likely would lose his leg.

"I just had a chunk of meatloaf down there," Hendrickson said, not to mention E-coli from the Helmand RiverHe tried to prepare himself emotionally for life with one leg by placing his undamaged left leg outside his hospital bed covers, and hiding his right leg up to the knee with the blanket.

His right leg will never again be what it once was.  But the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis, or IDEO -- a brace that provides more support to his damaged leg -- allows him to run, carry heavy loads of gear on a march, or drag wounded teammates out of the line of fire.  Without that brace, which he wore on his deployments beginning in 2012, he might have had to have his leg amputated if he wanted to do much beyond walking around the house.

"So many people are getting a second chance at saving a limb," he said.

Flying Aircraft to the Edge

The strain of the war also began to materialize on the Air Force in recent years, as airframes showed their age and airmen found it harder and harder to keep them flying.

The B-1B Lancer bomber in particular, which now has an average age of more than 33 years, became "overextended" in the Middle East, Air Force Global Strike Command head Gen. Timothy Ray said in 2019.

"We saw issues in the B-1 because we're just beating the heck out of them, deploying them, deploying them," Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. John Hyten told lawmakers during his nomination hearing in August 2019.  At that time, Hyten said, just six B-1s out of the fleet of 62 were fully mission-capable.

Though those numbers recovered somewhat, they were still far from where they should be.  In 2019 -- the latest year for which statistics are available -- the Air Force recorded a 46% mission-capable rate for the B-1, meaning at any given time, less than half of the fleet was ready to fly and carry out missions.

While that problem may not have been as severe in other airframes, it was a common issue throughout the fleet in recent years as the Air Force conducted a sustained air war, Gen. Herbert "Hawk" Carlisle, who was head of Air Combat Command until his retirement in 2017, said in a July interview.  Fighters, bombers, surveillance aircraft, tankers -- practically no type of aircraft was unaffected.

"We flew the wings off of every platform, whether it was AWACS, or JSTARS, or Rivet Joints, or F-15s and F-16s, or B-52s, or KC-135s and KC-10s," Carlisle said.  "Did we run them ragged in the Middle East?  Yeah.  Did they step up?  More than you can ever imagine.  What our young women and men did in uniform across all the services is extraordinary."

In an Aug. 13 interview, Ray acknowledged the toll so much air combat has taken on his bombers -- but said it's what they were meant to do.

"The safest place for an airplane to be is parked, but that's not why we have them," he said.  "It's a very old fleet.  What really should impress you is that the team can keep it going, when I think this challenge would have crushed any other Air Force.  ...  It was difficult, [but] we saved American lives."

Ray said that Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Charles "CQ" Brown has taken significant steps to balance how the service uses its aircraft by better prioritizing missions.

"We can do anything; we just can't do everything," Ray said.

But the military's continual need for surveillance in the Middle East led the Air Force to make trade-offs on modernization that might not be what's necessary in a war against a major power, Carlisle said.

With the U.S. military's primary foes in the late 2000s being the Taliban and Iraqi insurgents, he said, there was little need for an advanced fighter with stealth capability -- but a tremendous need for drones that could linger over areas and either watch or strike.

"Every corner of the Iraq and Afghanistan and Syria campaign wanted a Reaper overhead to give him the ...  'unblinking eye,'" said Carlisle, who after retiring became president and CEO of the National Defense Industrial Association, which counts defense contractors among its members and describes itself as a nonprofit group looking to educate the public on aspects of national security.

So in 2011, the F-22 Raptor fighter was canceled, with only 186 of the originally proposed 750 stealth aircraft now in the fleet.  Meanwhile, the Air Force set a punishing pace for airmen to fly MQ-1 Predator and MQ-9 Reaper drones, which in 2015 briefly hit a high of 65 combat air patrols per day -- a crushing operations tempo, and a significant investment in resources and manpower.

That balancing act made sense at the time but might not pay off in a war against China, Carlisle said.  The Predators are now retired, and Reapers -- though capable drones -- would be slow and easy pickings for Chinese radar and anti-aircraft systems.  Meanwhile, an F-22 restart is not in the cards.

A Second Chance in a Long War

After Hendrickson nearly lost his leg, he made jokes about being a pirate with a peg leg the following Halloween.  But underneath, he was wracked with guilt and feelings that he had let his brothers in arms down by not being there anymore.  The chances of him walking unassisted again were against him, let alone serving as a Green Beret in combat.  He began replaying in his mind his steps before the explosion, Monday-morning quarterbacking, and filled up with self-directed anger.

On the ninth anniversary of 9/11, Hendrickson and his unit launched a mission to clear the Chutu Valley in Uruzgan province, along the Helmand River.  Early on the next day, as the sky began to lighten, his team moved toward its first set of compounds, which were known to be used by the Taliban.

The team's interpreter had exposed himself to danger, so Hendrickson went over to the compound to pull him back.  Something moved fast and caught Hendrickson's eye -- he wasn't sure if it was an animal or a person running -- and he took a step forward in the entryway to see what it was.

His right foot stepped on a pressure plate, and the IED detonated.

He didn't feel anything -- not at first.  He hit the ground and couldn't figure out what had happened.  The dust and ammonia from the explosive swirled and made it impossible to breathe.  If he didn't stand up and get out of there, he thought, he would suffocate to death.

"My brief time on an ODA [Special Forces Operational Detachment Alpha] was cut short because I decided to peek around that corner, like an idiot," Hendrickson said.  "Then rage sets in -- 'I'm so stupid, why did I do that.'"

Depression set in, and at times, thoughts of suicide even crossed his mind.

But he pushed through his depression, and spent all of 2011 rehabilitating, motivated in part by his memory of the Taliban celebrating, and a question his dad asked him: When he is an old man and looks back, will he be ashamed because he allowed the injury to define him?  Or will he be proud because he used the challenge to make himself stronger?

He returned to Afghanistan alongside his fellow Green Berets -- with his leg in his IDEO brace -- in March 2012.  On another deployment in February 2016, he rallied his team and fought back against a heavy Taliban ambush in Baghlan Province, through machine-gun, rocket-propelled grenade, sniper and mortar fire, ultimately receiving the Silver Star for his bravery.

Hendrickson first joined the Navy four years before 9/11.  He deployed to the Persian Gulf, and later moved to the Air Force and deployed to Iraq.  He finally transferred to the Army, became a Green Beret, and deployed to Afghanistan for the first time with the Seventh Special Forces Group in May 2010, during the surge.  He continued with deployments to Afghanistan after nearly losing his leg, with the war still going while he rehabbed, and he wore the uniform until January 2020.  In his more than 22 years of service, 18 came during years of war.

Like many service members, Hendrickson doesn't describe his combat experience, or even his injury, in terms of shock.  They're points that are part of his long history serving in the military, the sorts of experiences that could be recounted by numerous other service members forged in a generation of combat.

They're the new normal.

And Hendrickson views even the near-loss of a limb as having a silver lining.

"Getting blown up was one of the best things that's happened to me," he said.  "I used it [the leg situation] to my benefit.  Yeah, I got some cool scars and whatnot.  But I've become a better man because of the situation I went through."



Monday, August 23, 2021

OPINION - Gerson and Capehart 8/20/2021

"Gerson and Capehart on Afghanistan, school mask mandatesPBS NewsHour 8/20/2021

SUMMARY:  Washington Post columnists Jonathan Capehart and Michael Gerson join Judy Woodruff to discuss the week in politics, including the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan and the politicization of mask mandates in Florida’s schools, and around the country.

Judy Woodruff (PBS NewsHour):  Americans watched this week as troubling scenes unfolded in Afghanistan and the Delta variant continued its deadly sweep across the country.

Here to talk about the implications of this are Jonathan Capehart and Michael Gerson.  That is Jonathan Capehart and Michael Gerson, both columnists — I had to repeat myself — both columnists for The Washington Post.

(LAUGHTER)

Judy Woodruff:  It's very good to have both of you.  David Brooks, we should say, is away.

Welcome to you, Michael.

Michael Gerson, Washington Post:  Thanks.

Judy Woodruff:  But, Jonathan, let me start with you.

Afghanistan all over the news this week.  We just keep watching these heartbreaking, disturbing pictures of people outside the Kabul Airport.  We have now heard from the President several times this week.  What do you make at this point of how the President and his team are handling this?

Jonathan Capehart, Washington Post:  It seems as though the President and his team are trying to do a better job of explaining and also a better job of explaining and handling the situation in Kabul than they did in the opening hours of this.

It is horrifying to see people so desperate that they would hang on to a roaring Air Force jet down the runway.  The video I woke up to this morning of I guess it was a Marine pulling a baby out of the crowd and over the barbed wire, heart-wrenching.

But I think what we saw on Monday with the President's speech, what we saw today in the East Room with the President's remarks and taking questions from the press is a President who is resolute in the decision that he made, the horrifying images and the news that we keep getting notwithstanding.

And when I look at the President and listen to him, two things come to mind.  One is, he is where the American — unfortunately, he is where the American public is and has been for years, which is, they have long wanted the United States out of Iraq, despite polling…

Judy Woodruff:  Out of Afghanistan.

Jonathan Capehart:  I'm sorry.  I'm sorry.  Out of — yes, thank you, Judy.  ....Out of Afghanistan.

So that's one.

Two, when he speaks as — about this issue, most people look at him as a commander — the commander in chief.  But when I look at him, I see a commander in chief who is the father of late service member.  So this is not foreign to him.  He has a child who went to war.  And, as commander in chief, he has to send men and women, sons and daughters, into war.

And the last point I will make on this, that's important, because only 1 percent of the U.S. population is involved in some way in the military.  This is something that former Secretary of Defense Bob [Robert] Gates used to hammer away at…

Judy Woodruff:  Right.

Jonathan Capehart:  … that we — more people need to be involved in defending this country.

And so I put all of that out there as a way of trying to at least, in some way, put the President's — I call it resoluteness — I think a lot of other people might call it stubbornness — on this issue into some context.

Judy Woodruff:  How do you piece together what you see this week?

Michael Gerson:  Well, I was kind of collecting the historical analogies that people were using this week.

And you had the Bay of Pigs by Leon Panetta, the former head of — White House Chief of Staff.  I heard the fall of Saigon, obviously, Dunkirk, which would be a little better outcome.  Also, from the British, the Suez crisis, in which Eisenhower really abandoned his allies.

There's a deep feeling of abandonment.  So, it's not a — when you have those examples, it's not a great week.  And some of the attributes, the best things about who this President is, his empathy, his competence, his way with our allies, seemed inoperative at the first part of this week.

In fact, I think that there's some damage done here to the President's reputation, basically because he was elected as a steady hand.  The purpose was to be a contrast to the constant drama of the Trump years.  These were people that are supposed to be a highly professional team, highly effective group of people.

And when you squander something that's central to your public identity, I think that it hurts.

Judy Woodruff:  And no question what you're saying about the President.

At the same time, Jonathan, as we heard from Sarah Chayes in her interview a few minutes ago with William Brangham, there's a lot more to this story.  There's a lot of history here.  We're going to be dissecting this for a long time.

And yet we still have to explain to ourselves, how did it happen?  How did it happen?

Jonathan Capehart:  Right.  How did it happen?

Craig Whitlock, our colleague at The Washington Post, in 2009 wrote a story that's now a book called "The Afghanistan Papers," where he happened upon transcripts of a series of interviews that were done with service members with the — I think it was the Office of Inspector General, where they never — they weren't talking to a reporter.

They were talking to colleagues, where they were perfectly blunt about the mismanagement, how horrible things were going, how the generals were saying one thing to the American public, a rosy picture, painting a rosy picture, and yet what was happening on the ground was the complete — was the complete opposite.

What we're finding out today, The Wall Street Journal had a story about this cable that came from State Department employees in Kabul saying directly, in the dissent channel, hey, this is not going well.  The situation is deteriorating.

And the State Department spokesperson said, yes, the secretary of state saw it.  He took it under advisement.  He may have made comments on it.

So the idea that they did not see this coming, I think to Michael's point….

Judy Woodruff:  Yes.

Jonathan Capehart:  …..  really dings the President on the competence issue, on the experience issue.

How could someone running for President on the record that Biden — that the President has, botch something like this so royally?

Judy Woodruff:  And picking up on that, Michael, I mean, Congress is going to be asking those questions, we think, as early as next week.

Michael Gerson:  No, that's absolutely true.  I think there are going to be a lot of questions about the how we got here, because this was a fiasco of planning.  And there were unforeseen elements here.

I would say one thing, though, having been in the White House in some moments like this, that I would like to maybe push back a little bit.  It's hard.  When you're in one of these moments — I saw in the interview with Stephanopoulos this week, where that…

Judy Woodruff:  With the President.

Michael Gerson:  Right — mentioned the example of the plane that you were talking about, the image.

And the President's response was, that was four or five days ago.  It was two days ago.  But it feels like four or five when you're in that kind of environment.

You have limited information, have to make real-time decisions.  So I respect people that do this job as well.  It's not — it's not hard — it's not easy.

Judy Woodruff:  There's going to be a lot of dissecting and questions asked and demanding of answers.

I also want to turn to the story that we just saw John Yang reporting on, Jonathan.  And that's this raging debate around the country about mask mandates.  You have got the Delta variant out there.  You have got parents worried, educators worried about teachers and students.  You have got a number of governors, Republican governors, who are starting to impose mandates.

But then you have got governors in Florida and Texas, Arizona, Republicans, saying no.  And they're getting into fights with school boards.

Explain the arguments here.  I mean, who's got the right argument at this point?

(LAUGHTER)

Jonathan Capehart:  I think that's a leading question.

(LAUGHTER)

Jonathan Capehart:  Look, the Republican governors, Governor Abbott [Texas] and Governor DeSantis in Florida, should be ashamed of themselves, what they are doing.

They are playing with people's lives.  They are playing politics with people's lives.  When you have teachers saying, please let us make the decision, don't stop us from making — requiring children to wear masks, it's not a matter of just the children's health.  It's the teachers' health as well.  It's the health of the school community.

And the idea that these governors are actually getting in the way, and the President not naming them, but saying, if you're not going to do the right thing, then at least get out of the way.  And, instead, they are hurling themselves in the middle of this, playing politics.  Maybe there's 2024 ambitions out there, but while they're playing politics with the lives of the people in their states and with children's lives, and it's outrageous.

Judy Woodruff:  And you do have parents, as we heard in John Yang's report, Michael, who are resisting.

Michael Gerson:  No, I think that's true.

I mean, Republicans have a very difficult circumstance here.  Basic public health measures, things like masking and this — vaccine requirements, these are not absurd or great violations of individual liberty — they're just the normal way that you oppose disease — have become deeply controversial in a significant portion of the Republican coalition.

It's as though you have — an important part of your coalition is just saying, well, we think that trash collection is a socialist plot, and, therefore, we oppose it.

It's a an extraordinary circumstance.  These people are responding to very weak real social pressures, the Republican governors, or political pressures.  They're making absolutely terrible decisions.  But I think the Republican coalition has some serious issues here, when that's what your demand is, that it's treated like a culture war issue, when in fact it's a public health issue.

Judy Woodruff:  And you do have Republican governors, Jonathan, like, what, Asa Hutchinson

Jonathan Capehart:  Right.

Judy Woodruff:  … in Arkansas, who has changed his mind.  I mean, he's openly said I should have done this sooner.

Jonathan Capehart:  Right.

And he's the only one really we can name, when it should be more than just Governor Hutchinson.  It should be — President, former President Trump should come out there and say, get the vaccine, wear a mask.  If you love me, I need you to hang around for whatever I might do, but at least to be a part of the solution, and not continue to be the problem, because one of the reasons why masks have become such an issue, vaccine — getting the vaccine has become such an issue, is because Donald Trump made it a political issue.

Judy Woodruff:  And then you have members of Congress, Michael, who have made a big deal out of the fact they have been required in the House of Representatives to wear masks.

And a number of them are saying:  I won't do it.

You now have senators, prominent — three prominent — well, they're all prominent.

(LAUGHTER)

Judy Woodruff:  All three — but three United States senators have — who have been vaccinated have come down with breakthrough infections.

Michael Gerson:  I think some of it is a fundamental misunderstanding of what public health is.

I mean, this is the kind of issue where we all succeed or fail together.  You know, the goal here is the aggregate good.  And talking about rights-based language in this context is really a misunderstanding of what the issue is.

Judy Woodruff:  Well, it's hard to believe some of what we're seeing out there.

Michael Gerson, Jonathan Capehart, thank you both.

Jonathan Capehart:  Thanks, Judy.

Michael Gerson:  Sure.  Thank you.



Monday, June 28, 2021

AMERICAN MILITARY - DoD to Fix Sexual Assault in Ranks?

"Defense Department moves to fix failures in addressing sexual assault in the ranksPBS NewsHour 6/22/2021

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  The U.S. Defense Department on Tuesday embraced a major reform aimed at stamping out sexual assault in the military.  Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III issued a statement saying he supported removing commanders from having any voice on whether service personnel should be prosecuted if accused of sexual assault.  Nick Schifrin has more.



Monday, April 05, 2021

AMERICAN MILITARY - Transgender Troops

"Trans troops, recruits celebrate new Pentagon rule allowing them to serve openlyPBS NewsHour 3/31/2021

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  The Pentagon announced new rules Wednesday allowing transgender military members to serve openly.  It fulfills an early pledge from President Joe Biden, restoring an Obama-era policy that was overturned by President Donald Trump.  Ali Rogin spoke to transgender service members who have been waiting for this day.



Wednesday, March 03, 2021

WARNING TO MILITARY FAMILIES - Home Management Companies in Military Housing


The upshot, the U.S. Military may NOT have your back and read the fine print in any contract.  IMHO our military has a history of choosing poor contractors for Military Housing, from management to repair.  Also why does the DoD continue to give these lucrative contracts to so few companies?  Why does Hunt have such a large bite.  Is 'someone' being paid off to award these contracts to greedy for-profit companies?

"Marine Family Shocked to Get $32,000 Bill After Garage Fire in Military Housing" by Patricia Kime, Military.com 3/2/2021

The house on Glendale Circle aboard Marine Corps Base Hawaii couldn't have been better located.  It occupies a corner lot not far from a splash park and community center, is near the beach and walking trails, and its lanai, or patio, overlooks a military training range and the Ulupau Crater, an ancient volcano on Oahu's windward coast.

The Rudd family -- Master Sgt. John Rudd, wife Tammy and their three children -- moved into the freshly painted four-bedroom duplex in June 2019.  When they accepted the home from management company Hunt Military Communities, they had few concerns, except that the home's fire detectors weren't operable, having been removed during the maintenance turnover from the previous tenant.

But that small issue, unaddressed, would ultimately cut short the family's residence.  The months that followed would include a destructive fire, and the Rudds would be saddled with a $32,000 bill for damages.  While in the end they were not forced to pay the bill, the ordeal left them disillusioned, homeless and wanting to warn other military families about their nightmare experience.

In conversations with Military.com, a Hunt representative said she could not immediately speak to the specifics of the Rudds' fire detector claims, but added that it is company policy to have smoke detectors installed before tenants move in.  She said the family's bill was reversed when the fire was determined to be accidental, though the Rudds maintain that the issue was resolved only after a military family advocate stepped in.

The Rudds say they had requested that the alarm systems be reinstalled in their home after they moved in, but months passed without action to fix the problem.  According to the Rudds, they filed a second work request for the repairs, noting that their lease prohibits tenants from tampering with smoke detectors.

When that inquiry went ignored, Rudd installed a temporary smoke alarm near his kids' bedrooms, and the family went on with their lives.  Photographs from the beginning of their occupancy of the home show the smoke detectors were not installed.

Their happy, if slightly hazardous, tenancy ended Dec. 23, 2020, when a lithium-ion battery on John's electric bike exploded in their garage.

The blast buckled the garage door, ignited everything within 10 feet and sent smoke billowing into the house -- all without ever triggering a smoke alarm.  The devices that were supposed to be reinstalled by Hunt 18 months earlier sat silently on a shelf where they'd been placed, and smoke never reached the alarm Rudd had put near the kids' bedrooms, according to photos.

Fortunately, it was 11:30 in the morning.  Rudd was at work, and his family was getting ready to go grocery shopping for Christmas.

"It sounded like there was a big truck ramming into the garage door," Tammy Rudd said.  "I immediately grabbed my youngest, who was in the backyard; my eight-year-old was playing a video game.  ...  My 19-year-old was upstairs in the shower.  I walked out and saw smoke billowing out of the garage and the garage door bowed out.  At that point, I started freaking out."

After several frantic minutes that included 8-year-old Tobias running into the house to alert his older sister, the family got out and the fire department arrived, extinguishing the blaze and leaving behind access holes, charred belongings and a house full of soot.

The Rudds spent that night and the next four in a temporary home provided by Hunt, grateful to be alive and celebrating the holidays.

They never could have predicted what would happen next, however:  Nearly two months to the day after the fire, they received a bill for $32,131.08 from Hunt for damages related to the fire, including air duct cleaning, repainting, restoration and a new garage door.

Adding insult to injury, Hunt denied their request to be reimbursed for $6,930 in rent for the remainder of December, January and most of February.  The company had been collecting it even though the Rudds never spent another night in the home.

"Your request for your rent to be refunded to you from the date of the fire has been denied.  I have, however, waived the 28-day notice to vacate for you that is required," wrote Peyton Hoban, community director for Ohana Military Communities, Hunt's subsidiary in Hawaii, in a Feb. 18 email obtained by Military.com.

The emails and bill left the Rudds speechless.

"The last week has been more stressful than the days following the actual fire," Tammy Rudd told Military.com.  "If we can't close out [of housing], John cannot execute his permanent change of station orders.  They are threatening his career."

"They have essentially crafted a strategy exploiting us rather than protect us," John Rudd added.

Since roughly 1996, military housing on domestic U.S. installations has been constructed and managed by private companies, an effort to improve the housing stock for service members and their families following years of maintenance neglect by the Defense Department.

Under the arrangement, DoD officials were to provide oversight of the companies to ensure they provided quality housing in return for service members' Basic Allowance for HousingBut over the years, the Pentagon has taken a back seat, allowing the companies, which hold 50-year contracts to provide military housing, free rein to manage the properties.

In 2018, Reuters published the results of a two-year investigation of military housing that revealed systemic negligence by the companies, including falsification of records and other types of deception, shoddy construction and dangerous living conditions.  Those conditions included faulty wiring, extensive mold contamination, flaking lead-based paint and vermin.

In response to the Reuters coverage and subsequent news reports, as well as a survey of military families that found more than half said they had "negative or very negative experiences" with their houses, Congress held a series of hearings in early 2019 to understand the scope of the problems and hold the companies and DoD accountable.

During testimony, the service secretaries and chiefs promised to inspect the homes, hold listening sessions with residents and develop a tenant bill of rights that would give more power to residents to negotiate with their landlords.

The CEOs of the private housing management companies also pledged to do better and "learn from our mistakes."

"At Hunt, we do not succeed unless we provide our residents with safe and healthy homes," President John Ehle said during a Feb. 13, 2019, hearing.  "We are a company of accountability, and if someone is falling short of expectations, we take action."

Hunt manages 32,000 homes that serve 165,000 residents, and holds interest in an additional 20,000 homes across 49 military installations in 21 states.

In 2019, eight military families filed a lawsuit against Hunt over their housing at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas, which they claimed contained pervasive mold and infestations, contaminated ductwork and other maintenance issues.

The same year, a federal judge in Gulfport, Mississippi, dismissed a case filed by a family at Keesler Air Force Base over mold in their Hunt-managed property.

Other military housing property managers, including Lincoln Military Housing, Corvias Property Management and the Michaels Organization, face similar suits.

To ensure that the companies abide by their contracts and provide quality housing and service to U.S. troops, the Defense Department in 2020 rolled out its own Tenant Bill of Rights that gave residents a list of accommodations they can expect in housing, including healthy homes with working appliances, clear instructions on leases and expectations, and the right to report problems and to expect maintenance and property management services that exceed industry standards.

Another three rights are expected to be instituted by this summer, including the ability to withhold rent during disputes and assistance in mediating issues.  These may have helped the Rudds in their battle with Ohana, which left the family not knowing where to turn immediately after the fire and in the faceoff over the bill.

"At one point, I was asking myself, do I pay the 32K or do I go retain an attorney and just pay them that money?" Rudd said.

Immediately after the blaze, Hunt housed the Rudds in another home on base, with an expectation that they vacate by Dec. 28, according to a text exchange between Ohana representatives and Rudd.

Not knowing what to do, Rudd consulted with family members in the legal and insurance professions and learned he should contact his insurance company, USAA, which holds his renter's insurance.  That coverage paid for a hotel where the family moved after their five-day allowance in temporary housing ended.

The family stayed briefly on Waikiki and then checked into the temporary lodging facility on base, where they remain.

In the subsequent insurance investigation, USAA concluded that the fire was not the family's fault.  Company representatives notified Rudd in mid-February they planned to file a claim against the battery manufacturer and would deny any claims filed against the Rudds by the housing office, according to a report provided to the family and obtained by Military.com.

The Rudds assumed Hunt would do the same -- seek reimbursement from its own insurer or the battery maker -- but instead, the family received the $32,000 bill on Feb. 22, payable on receipt.

"From the beginning, we've done the right thing, and I'm just really confused as to why I have to help with the bill for the repairs," John Rudd said.

In an email along with the bill, an Ohana representative offered the couple a payment plan.  Rudd, an explosive ordnance disposal technician who has served nearly 20 years in the Corps and holds a Bronze Star with Combat V device for disarming a roadside bomb while under fire in Afghanistan in 2011 while, said he was at a loss for what to do next.

"They already have the infrastructure in place to charge Marines payments with interest.  If they are doing this to me, they absolutely are doing it to other Marines with no agency," he said.

In addition to family, Rudd consulted base legal services; his brother, also a Marine stationed in Quantico, Virginia; and his brother's wife, Jessica Rudd, a former Marine who was selected Marine Corps Spouse of the Year in 2017 by Armed Forces Insurance and Military Spouse magazine.

A lifelong military family advocate, Jessica Rudd was stunned by the story and took action.  On Feb. 24, she emailed several of her contacts in Congress who work military personnel issues.

"If they can do this to an E-8, they can do this to anyone," Jessica Rudd said.

Two days after Jessica Rudd’s email, the Rudds received another bill -- this one for just $70, the cost for some broken blinds and a refrigerator drawer.  The bill for fire damages had vanished in the wake of action taken on behalf of the family by Jessica Rudd's contacts, including military advocates and lawmakers.

The Rudds also have been told they will be reimbursed for the rent paid after the fire made the house uninhabitable.

Paris Cousin, senior director of operations at Hunt Military Communities, said March 1 that it is company policy to turn homes over to prospective residents with installed smoke detectors.

"I couldn't tell you exactly what the situation was back in 2019, but I will tell you when someone moves into a home, smoke detectors are provided, installed in homes," Cousin said.

When pressed about the existence of photos taken weeks after the Rudds' move-in date showing no smoke detectors, Cousin said she was responding to Military.com’s questions about the Rudds' bill and not smoke detectors.  She added that the company keeps maintenance records on the homes, but said those were not available to her at the time of her call to a reporter.

Regarding the bill and the dropping of the $32,000 charge, Cousin said Hunt receives quotes for damages that "initially would be applied" to the residents' close-out bill -- the first bill they received.  But since the cause of the fire was ruled to be accidental, "we reversed the charges and notified the resident of this."

Cousin added that she was "not familiar with" Jessica Rudd's effort to help her brother-in-law.

"I'm not familiar with that part of it.  I just know that for us here, we reversed the charges because at the end, it was an accidental fire and the resident was not responsible for it," Cousin said.

The Consumer Products Safety Commission has conducted at least 64 recalls of products using lithium-ion batteries since 2006.  Explosions and deaths from lithium-ion batteries remain rare but have happened.

In 2008, lithium-ion batteries that were being charged on a Navy mini-submarine at Pearl Harbor were responsible for a blaze onboard.  Since then, the service has carefully controlled and vetted lithium-ion batteries on ships, including banning all vaping devices from vessels after they sparked fires.

Across the country, lithium-ion batteries have been responsible for fires and several deaths:  In 2018, the batteries in a Tesla were found to have contributed to a deadly crash that killed two teenagers.  And batteries in cellphones, cameras and dive equipment were cited as a possible source for a fire that killed 34 on a dive boat off the California coast in 2019.

The battery explosion in John Rudd's electric bike caused extensive smoke and radiant heat damage throughout the garage, according to the investigation, and sent smoke into every nook and cranny of the home, destroying many electronics; clothing; and upholstered belongings.

If the fire had happened at night while the family was sleeping, they might not have made it out alive, Tammy Rudd said.

"If we had not been right there, it could have been a lot worse," she said.

John Rudd said he is disappointed that Hunt has never acknowledged the missing smoke detectors, which remained sitting on a counter in the home for the next tenant.

He had high praise for his unit, the command and the base legal office, whom he described as supportive and helpful throughout the ordeal.

He added that he was reluctant to go public with the story, but decided in the end that the incident could serve as an example of a housing company trying to "take advantage" of their military tenants.

"We need junior Marines, junior sailors, junior soldiers, junior airmen to be protected from [the companies].  I've got to be the last service member this happens to," Rudd said.

The Rudds are moving this spring to Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, where they had planned to live on base.  Now, however, they say they likely will buy a house in the community, even though the market is hot in the popular coastal region.

"We've decided we'll take our chances," Tammy Rudd said.



Monday, September 09, 2019

TRUMP'S WALL - Robbing Our Military



"Behind Trump’s ‘unprecedented’ reallocation of DOD money for border security" PBS NewsHour 9/5/2019

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  President Trump is diverting some money for Defense Department infrastructure to instead construct or repair additional barrier sections on the U.S.-Mexico border.  The 127 projects losing funding include Hurricane Maria recovery efforts in Puerto Rico, and education and health services at military bases at home and overseas.  Lisa Desjardins talks to Judy Woodruff about the details and the reaction.



Monday, June 24, 2019

CYBER WAR - U.S. v Russia

"Why cyber warfare represents diplomatic territory" PBS NewsHour 6/17/2019

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  The New York Times reported over the weekend on U.S. military attempts to infiltrate the Russian power grid.  The effort represents the latest offensive in an increasingly digital conflict with Russia, whose 2016 election interference is well documented.  John Yang talks to R.P. Eddy, a former National Security Council official and founder of an intelligence consulting firm, about this new frontier.

Monday, June 03, 2019

AMERICAN MILITARY - Veterans Still Suffering

"Why many combat veterans are still suffering, years after the fight ended" PBS NewsHour 5/27/2019

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  On average, 20 U.S. military veterans daily die by suicide, and suicides among active duty personnel are increasing.  A number of treatments for veterans with depression and post-traumatic stress disorder exist, but they have drawbacks.  Special correspondent Mike Cerre looks at treatment options and follows up on U.S. Marines with whom he was embedded during the war in Iraq.

MEMORIAL DAY - Arlington’s Old Guard

"For Arlington’s Old Guard, the mission is to honor, and the standard is perfection" PBS NewsHour 5/27/2019

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  Arlington National Cemetery is well known as the final resting place for fallen U.S. soldiers.  Less famous is the elite unit that performs the funerals for these military heroes: The Old Guard, the Army’s oldest active duty regiment [since 1784].  Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) who served in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as The Old Guard, covers it in his new book, “Sacred Duty,” and joins Judy Woodruff to discuss.

Monday, November 26, 2018

TRUMP AGENDA - New Border Directive

It may not violate the law, but it IS still immoral and unethical.

"Does Trump’s new border directive violate federal law?" PBS NewsHour 11/21/2018

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  More than 5,700 service members are providing support at the U.S.-Mexico border.  Now, the President has authorized troops to defend border patrol agents, “including a show or use of force (including lethal force).”  Nick Schifrin talks to former Army lawyer Geoffrey Corn, who teaches at South Texas College of Law Houston, about how Secretary of Defense James Mattis is walking a legal “tight rope.”

Monday, October 29, 2018

AMERICAN MILITARY - Experience to College Credit

I am retired Navy (22yrs), Vietnam Vet, and in my military experience was a asset.  Looks like that has changed.

"Turning soldiers into scholars by turning military experience into college credit" PBS NewsHour 10/23/2018

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  Despite years leading troops and managing equipment on the front lines, soldiers returning to school may have to start from the beginning, alongside teenagers who have never held a similar level of responsibility.  Now, a new Colorado law awards college credit for military experience--and requires that the state's schools accept it.  Hari Sreenivasan reports.

Hari Sreenivasan (NewsHour):  This year, Colorado legislators embraced Pikes Peak's model by passing legislation to help all Colorado military and veteran students.

Colorado's new law says any state-funded institution has to be able to evaluate the knowledge or skills that a student might have picked up in the military.  And if that student can earn credit for it, those credits have to be transferable to every state institution.

Monday, October 22, 2018

AMERICAN MILITARY - Wounds of War

"New generation faces mental ‘wounds of war’" PBS NewsHour 10/17/2018

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  President Trump awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor on Wednesday to Sgt. Maj. John Canley, who saved fellow Marines in Vietnam.  Meanwhile, another veteran made headlines recently by admitting that he needed saving.  Kansas City mayoral candidate Jason Kander dropped out of the race citing PTSD.  Reps. Ruben Gallego (D) and Brian Mast (R) join Nick Schifrin to discuss challenges for younger veterans.