POLITICS - Obama Takes the Supremes to the Wood Shed

"Supreme Court Gets a Rare Rebuke, in Front of a Nation" by ADAM LIPTAK, New York Times

Excerpt

It is not unusual for presidents to disagree publicly with Supreme Court decisions. But they tend to do so at news conferences and in written statements, not to the justices’ faces.

President George W. Bush, for instance, did not hesitate to criticize a 2008 ruling recognizing the rights of prisoners held at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba — but he did it at a news conference in Rome. President Richard M. Nixon said he was disappointed with a 1974 decision ordering him to turn over the tapes that would help end his presidency — in a statement read by his lawyer.

President Obama’s approach at the State of the Union address Wednesday night was more personal, and he seemed a little self-conscious about it.

Before he began his attack on a Supreme Court decision not yet a week old, Mr. Obama added a few words that had not been in the prepared text. The new preface — “with all due deference to separation of powers” — seemed to acknowledge that he was aiming unusual rhetorical fire at several Supreme Court justices sitting right in front of him.

Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., one of the justices in the majority in the decision under attack, shook his head as he heard the president’s summary of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, and he appeared to mouth the words “not true.”

It was not quite the shouted “You lie!” from Representative Joe Wilson, Republican of South Carolina, at September’s presidential address to a joint session of Congress. But in its way, the breach of decorum on both sides was much starker.

As far as I am concerned, the Supremes, especially Alito, deserved every word.

Also note that this issue exists because of the legal prescient of corporations being equivalent to individual citizens and have the same rights, which is a big mistake we made in the past.

Corporations should NEVER be the equivalent to individuals when it comes to Constitutional Rights. But you can bet that corporations would fight tooth-and-nail to prevent any change in law or a Constitutional Amendment.