TRUMP WHITE HOUSE - More Chaos

"White House ‘in a state of chaos’ as Trump’s chief departs" PBS NewsHour 12/8/2018

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  President Trump announced Saturday that his chief of staff John Kelly is leaving his post by the end of the year.  Kelly replaced Trump’s first chief of staff, Reince Priebus in July 2017.  Trump said Kelly's successor would be declared in the coming days.  To put this in perspective, NewsHour White House Correspondent Yamiche Alcindor joins Hari Sreenivasan via Skype.

OPINION - Shields and Brooks 7/28/2017

"Shields and Brooks on Reince Priebus' exit, GOP health bill's defeat" PBS NewsHour 7/28/2017

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  Syndicated columnist Mark Shields and New York Times columnist David Brooks join Judy Woodruff to discuss the week's news, including President Trump's firing of White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus and what it means for relations with the Republican Party, the Senate's rejection of a “skinny repeal” of the Affordable Care Act and Anthony Scaramucci's obscene tirade.

JUDY WOODRUFF (NewsHour):  It's been another head-turning week in Washington, from the Republican failure on health care, to the President's surprising statement on transgender military members, and a flurry of profanity from the new White House communications director and then, to cap it off, today's announcement from Mr. Trump that he is changing his chief of staff.

Here to help make sense of it all, Shields and Brooks.  That is syndicated columnist Mark Shields and New York Times columnist David Brooks.

So, I thought we had a lot of things to talk about, David, before about an hour ago, when we learned that the President was changing his chief of staff.

Is this — I guess we knew that this might happen.  Reince Priebus has been in trouble with this President, we think, for a while, but what do you think?

DAVID BROOKS, The New York Times:  Well, he was never given the chance to do the job.

Every other chief of staff we have ever seen sort of controls the schedule.  They control the tempo in the White House.  They're the alter ego of the President.  They are given some clear sign of respect that they speak for the President.

And Priebus never had that.  And so he was wounded and stabbed before Scaramucci came along.  He was stabbed like a piñata.  And so he was sort of a pathetic figure hanging out there.  And so this doesn't come as a total surprise, except for maybe the timing.

As for General Kelly taking the job, I sort of question his sanity there.  He's been a loyalist, but I really — with all due respect to the Marine Corps, I don't see how someone who's been trained in pretty orderly chain of command is going to survive this mess.

If he can control the schedule, it will be one thing.  I just don't think that's going to happen, given all the independent power figures all around him.

JUDY WOODRUFF:  What do you make of it, Priebus out and Kelly in?

MARK SHIELDS, Syndicated Columnist:  Judy, I am continually amazed that it's not simply a matter of human decency or empathy when your boss is firing anybody to make sure that person leaves and has a soft landing, that they can leave with their self-respect, that they can leave with someplace to go to, with a plausible explanation to their family and friends that they weren't humiliated, abused and derided.

This President treats staff and others like a used sickness bag on a bad airplane flight.  There's just absolutely no sense of respect or decency shown, so you humiliate somebody.

And for those who are left, there is just a sense of, could I be next?  It certainly doesn't inspire loyalty.

As far as Kelly is concerned, General Kelly is a four-star general.  But I think David put his finger on it.  He had a very distinguished and honorable military career.  But he grew up in a military structure.  He thrived up in a military structure.

As a chief of staff at the White House, this is a freelancing operation.  There's no chain of command.  There are all sorts of people who go in and see the President any time, who are not accountable to you or responsible.

And least of all, you have a President who will even — won't abide by any sense of a chain of command or structure.  And I don't know that General Kelly has any particular political gifts or knowledge of the legislative process or dealings with the press.

So I'm not — I know that the President admires him and the job he's done at Homeland Security and his career, but I don't see the fit.

JUDY WOODRUFF:  Well, we should say that Reince Priebus, just in the last few minutes, David, put out a statement saying it's been one of the greatest honors of his life to serve this President.

I guess that's what one expects, maybe.

DAVID BROOKS:  Gracious.  I'm not sure he would pass a lie-detector test.

(LAUGHTER)

DAVID BROOKS:  But one of the things that's happening here is that the President is moving away from the Republican Party.

Priebus was a link to the Republican Party.  The congressional Republicans were — had some sort of relationship.  Jeff Sessions was a key to the link between congressional Republicans and Donald Trump, and he's been under assault in the most humiliating way imaginable.

And so you're beginning to see an administration — I don't know what party they're joining, maybe the Bannon party, but it's not the Republican Party.  And if you want to pass legislation, you probably need your allies on Capitol Hill.  If you want to survive investigative committees, you probably want some friends in your party.  And this administration seems to be moving the other direction.

-----

JUDY WOODRUFF:  Well, which leads us to another — I mean, David, you said they have had a struggle anything passed, getting legislation passed.  This was a flame-out for them.

DAVID BROOKS:  Yes, this was a bigger thing than Donald Trump, though.

It was only one bill that lost.  It was four bills that lost.  And it wasn’t only a six-months effort.  It was a seven-year effort.

MARK SHIELDS:  I agree.

DAVID BROOKS:  And you could say you could go back to Newt Gingrich.

Think of all the ways the Republicans have tried to trim entitlements like Medicaid or cut government.  Name a signal victory.  There’s not a victory.  They haven’t been able to trim one agency, cut back one entitlement.  They failed every single time.

And that suggests isn’t an electoral failure.  It’s not a failure of whether Mitch McConnell had the right strategy or not, though that was lamentable.  It’s a failure of trying to take things away from people.

People are under assault from technology.  They’re under assault from a breakdown in social fabric, breakdown in families.  They have got wage stagnations.  They just don’t want a party to come in and say, we’re going to take more away from you.

And so Republicans have to wrap their minds around the fact that the American people basically decided that health care is a right, and they figure, we should get health care.  And our fellow countrymen should get health care.

It doesn’t mean you have to do it the way the Democrats want to do it with single-payer or whatever.  You can do it with market mechanisms.  But you have basically got to wrap your mind around universal coverage.

JUDY WOODRUFF:  How do you see what happened here, Mark?  And where do you see it going on health care?

MARK SHIELDS:  Judy, the yapping dog, which was the Republican Party, after chasing the bus for seven years, caught it and had no idea what to do with the bus.

All you needed is that final vote that Lisa described so well, and that is the final argument, after seven years, after winning three national elections where that is your organizing issue, we’re going to repeal Obamacare, came down to a single promise and pledge to your fellow Republicans from the leadership, and that is, what you are voting for, we promise will not become law.

I mean, if you can imagine anything, I mean, that just said it all.  I mean, it was a terrible performance.  The House voted on something without even a congressional budget scoring of it.  The Senate voted on something.  They didn’t even have a bill when they brought it to the floor.  There was no legislation.

So, I mean, it was horrendous.  It was disappointing.  There were no ideas.  There was no will.  There was no imagination.  And there was certainly no courage.

I don’t blame Donald Trump, but what was Donald Trump saying?  Donald Trump was saying he’s disappointed in the attorney general because he wasn’t loyal to him.  That was his contribution to the debate on health care as it came to a vote in the Senate.

AUTOBIOGRAPHY - President Carter's Chief of Staff

"How a boy from segregated South grew up to be Jimmy Carter’s chief of staff" PBS NewsHour 11/26/2015

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  Before he was Jimmy Carter’s chief of staff, Hamilton Jordan was just a boy living in a deeply segregated south.  For a decade, he worked on an autobiography about growing up in that place and time, before passing away from mesothelioma.  His daughter, Kathleen Jordan finished the book, and speaks to Judy Woodruff about the work.

HARI SREENIVASAN (NewsHour):  They were known collectively as the “Georgia mafia” — Washington outsiders who played key roles in the Jimmy Carter presidential campaigns, and in the White House.  Among them, Hamilton Jordan, who was the president`s Chief of Staff and top confidant.  He died of cancer in 2008.  He left behind a mostly finished memoir.

His daughter Kathleen has edited and completed the book, “A Boy from Georgia: Coming of Age in the Segregated South.”  She talked to Judy recently.

JUDY WOODRUFF (NewsHour):  So let me — I have to ask you first, it looks like Hamilton Jordan, Kathleen Jordan, but it`s “Jerden;” where did that come from?

KATHLEEN JORDAN, Editor, “A Boy From Georgia”:  You know, my dad always said it`s the Southern pronunciation of the surname.  If you hear it in old spirituals, you`ll hear it pronounced the “River Jerden.”  So I think it`s a long-standing tradition of the South.  At least that`s what we were told and we've taken that forward with us.

JUDY WOODRUFF:  I knew your father, Hamilton Jordan, because he worked for Jimmy Carter.  I covered Carter as governor of Georgia, then as President of the United States.  Your father was a strategist, he was chief of staff, but this book really is about his growing up in South Georgia, growing up in the segregationist South, isn't it?

KATHLEEN JORDAN:  When political junkies hear that my dad has a new book out, they`re excited because they think it may be about the Carter years, and what I say to those people is that it may not necessarily be about his political years, but it`s about his early indoctrination into politics, and kind of learning about politics from the people around him and about the formation of his political skills.