AMERICAN POLITICS - Bezos Exposed

"Why Bezos’ accusations against the National Enquirer are a ‘big deal’" PBS NewsHour 2/8/2019

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos is accusing the National Enquirer of extortion and blackmail.  Bezos says its parent company, AMI, tried to deter him from investigating how the tabloid obtained intimate photos of his extramarital affair.  The New York Times' Jim Rutenberg tells Amna Nawaz about AMI CEO David Pecker's relationship with President Trump, and how Bezos' ownership of the Washington Post factors in.

AFFORDABLE CARE ACT - Court Attack Consequences

The Republicans immoral and unethical attack on ACA.

"Why invalidating the ACA could cause ‘enormous disruption’ to American health care" PBS NewsHour 12/17/2018

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  The day before this year's deadline to sign up for health insurance under the Affordable Care Act, a judge in Texas ruled the law unconstitutional.  As the case makes its way through the appeals process, Amna Nawaz sits down with Julie Rovner of Kaiser Health News to discuss who's involved in the legal challenge and the "enormous disruption" that would result from invalidation of the law.

OPINION - U.S. District Court NSA Case Decision

"Judge on NSA Case Cites 9/11 Report, But It Doesn’t Actually Support His Ruling" by Justin Elliott, ProPublica 12/28/2013

Excerpt

In a new decision in support of the NSA's phone metadata surveillance program, U.S. district court Judge William Pauley cites an intelligence failure involving the agency in the lead-up to the 9/11 attacks.  But the judge's cited source, the 9/11 Commission Report, doesn't actually include the account he gives in the ruling.  What’s more, experts say the NSA could have avoided the pre-9/11 failure even without the metadata surveillance program.

We previously explored the key incident in question, involving calls made by hijacker Khalid al-Mihdhar from California to Yemen, in a story we did over the summer, which you can read below.

In his decision, Pauley writes:  "The NSA intercepted those calls using overseas signals intelligence capabilities that could not capture al-Mihdhar's telephone number identifier.  Without that identifier, NSA analysts concluded mistakenly that al-Mihdhar was overseas and not in the United States."

As his source, the judge writes in a footnote, "See generally, The 9/11 Commission Report."  In fact, the 9/11 Commission report does not detail the NSA's intercepts of calls between al-Mihdhar and Yemen.  As the executive director of the commission told us over the summer, "We could not, because the information was so highly classified publicly detail the nature of or limits on NSA monitoring of telephone or email communications.”

To this day, some details related to the incident and the NSA's eavesdropping have never been aired publicly.  And some experts told us that even before 9/11 -- and before the creation of the metadata surveillance program -- the NSA did have the ability to track the origins of the phone calls, but simply failed to do so.

Note that the above argument does NOT prove the judge was wrong.  The current metadata collection program is a tool that IF it had existed before 9/11 MAY have made it easier to find al-Mihdhar in California.

The current program exists because our national security teams realized that we need a way to back-track phone calls between those who wish the US harm.  The current program is very bulky, and finding links between wrong-doers is like finding a specific needle in a stack of needles, but it's better than nothing.