SUMMARY: Wednesday’s daily briefing of the Coronavirus Task Force came amid new information about a key administration firing. Until Tuesday, Dr. Rick Bright served as a top federal expert [BARDA] on vaccines, heavily involved in the response to COVID-19. Now, Bright says he was forced out of his job because he refused to tout unproven treatments for the disease. Yamiche Alcindor joins Judy Woodruff to discuss.
SUMMARY: There are forecasts tonight that the worst of the COVID-19 pandemic is still ahead, even after the current wave passes.
The warnings come as deaths in the United States have nearly doubled from a week ago. But, also, at the same time, momentum is building here and abroad to lift restrictions.
SUMMARY: Officials at all levels of U.S. government are engaged in discussions about how and when to resume commerce and other activities. Polling data shows the majority of Americans support restrictions to prevent the spread of novel coronavirus, but there have been some pockets of resistance against these measures. Yamiche Alcindor reports on the beliefs and the organizations driving the dissent.
SUMMARY:Russia’s 2014 annexation of Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula was the largest European land grab since World War II. No shots were fired there, but in eastern Ukraine, a brutal war ensued, dragging on for nearly six years so far and killing 13,000. The conflict drew relatively little U.S. attention until the impeachment crisis surrounding President Trump. Special correspondent Simon Ostrovsky reports.
SUMMARY: Syndicated columnist Mark Shields and New York Times columnist David Brooks join Judy Woodruff to discuss the week’s political news, including how the impeachment inquiry is affecting President Trump's support among Republicans, fallout from Trump's handling of northern Syria and the military advance by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and the changing dynamics of the 2020 Presidential race.
Judy Woodruff (NewsHour): And now to the analysis of Shields and Brooks. That's syndicated columnist Mark Shields and New York Times columnist David Brooks.
Hello to both of you.
So let's pick up, Mark, with where — with my conversation just then with John Kasich. He said he reluctantly has come to the place, after hearing and following what's gone on in the last couple of days, that President Trump should be impeached.
Now, he's only one of a very few Republicans. But do you see, given all the events of this week, the testimony before Congress, what Mick Mulvaney said yesterday, that this argument for impeachment is getting stronger?
Mark Shields, syndicated columnist: Yes, it most certainly is, Judy.
I'd say right now that there's two dozen, maybe headed to three dozen House Republicans will end up voting for impeachment at the current velocity.
Judy Woodruff: In the House?
Mark Shields: In the House.
And I don't think there's any question about it. I mean, it's — you can feel it.
Just put yourself in the shoes of trying to be a defender of the President, a supporter of the President. You wake up on an hourly basis — or certainly a daily basis, and almost hourly now, you're hit with another thunderbolt.
What is it? It's foreign policy. It's Mick Mulvaney in a condescending, antagonistic, stupid — you understood why he's never been the spokesman, why he's never had a press conference before — harmful.
You can't defend the President. So what Republicans are doing, if you will notice — and led by FOX News — is, they're attacking Democrats, is what they're doing. There's no defense.
And so I just think you can feel support shrinking.
Judy Woodruff: Do you — how do you assess this?
David Brooks, New York Times: Yes.
I mean, if your defense was, there was no quid pro quo, it's pretty hard to stand on that ground by now. What we have learned over the last two weeks or three weeks is that the transcript we heard several weeks ago now, it was true.
We learned on the transcript — for me, if you read the transcript, there was a quid pro quo.
Mark Shields: That's right.
David Brooks:And now we have testimony from Fiona Hill, who was the deputy secretary of state for Ukraine, that there was quid pro quo, basically, that it Trump was doing this, there was a separate foreign policy run by Trump and Giuliani, bypassing the normal foreign policy apparatus.
And there have been a whole series of witnesses that have basically attested to that. Mulvaney puts the exclamation point.
So, if that was your defense, then it's hard not to vote for impeachment.
If your defense is, this doesn't rise to the level of impeachment, then you can still wriggle out of it. And I suspect that's where the Senate Republicans will go. I do not see — I see John Kasich, who has been, like, the number one Trump critic in the Republican Party, is here. Congressman Rooney is here.
Judy Woodruff: Right.
David Brooks: But, so far, there aren't many others. And I'm skeptical that you will see too many Republican senators.
Judy Woodruff: So what is the argument that Republicans are hanging on — hanging there belief to, that — you're just alluding to this — that this is not an impeachable offense?
Is it what the President is saying, that I'm unconventional? Is it, we're always asking foreign countries to do something for us?
David Brooks: Yes.
Well, I think, right now, it's a position in search of an argument. So they know where they are, because they know where their voters are, and they're terrified of their voters. And they have got to find some rationalization to explain why they are. And this seems to be the most rational rationalization. This is what countries do all the time, and the President was defending American interests, and the media is out to get him.
And that's an argument that sort of makes itself. Whether it's compelling to anybody else doesn't really matter, because it has to — the Republicans are the ones that have to move.
Judy Woodruff: So, Mark, if David's right — even if it passes in the House, if there's an impeachment vote in the House, but go to the Senate, that there's not the votes in the Senate? What's…
Mark Shields:There are not the votes today, Judy.
But think where we were two weeks ago. I mean, this thing is moving at a pace and a velocity that I don't think any of us could have predicted. And after this week, I mean, we haven't even talked about the cave, the capitulation, the total — David mentioned he's doing this in the national interest.
I mean, we saw a demonstration of the national interest this week. I mean, there's no way anybody could look at that and have confidence in this man, let alone this administration.
Judy Woodruff: You're talking about Syria and Turkey.
Mark Shields: Yes. Talking about Syria. Talking about the abandonment, because just think, think if you were South Korea today, all right?
You're surrounded. On one side, you got China, a menacing force, not that far off your shore. You have got North Korea and a certified madman on your border. And what have you relied on? The good word, the trust, the honor of the United States of America.
And we saw that just absolutely trashed and abandoned this week in the Middle East by the President.
Judy Woodruff: And, David, let's talk about that.
I mean, this decision, it came sort of out of the blue. People didn't know about it. And then we learned the President had given — the administration said it wasn't a green light. But the Turks have gone in, and they are — they have now been given permission basically by the U.S. to control that so-called safe zone.
David Brooks: Yes.
Fareed Zakaria mentioned there's never been a moment that he could think of where a bad decision was made, and the blunder came immediately, the results and the catastrophe came right away.
And it was a total win for Erdogan and the Turks, a total win for Syria, and a total win for Russia, because the Turks get to do their ethnic cleansing. The Syrians get to go into the region. The Russians have been trying to get into the region. Now they get to walk into the region. The Russians have — or the Iranians have a proxy.
So it was a — the score was 56 Erdogan, zero for Trump, and zero for the United States.
And I think this is — what's shocking is just the moral — not only the incompetence. I mean, the letter Trump wrote to Erdogan could have been written by a kindergartner. It was — it didn't look like an official government letter.
And then the — just the moral callousness of having no remorse about the deaths and the cleansing. I think it's — I think this, combined with impeachment, is what shakes people. This is a more shocking event.
And it goes against a generation of Republican and American foreign policy to be a stabilizing force in that region. And it was also a sign — and I think this is where — the way — the only way I can see that you really get to some erasure — some erosion from the Republican side — is a lot of Republicans think, well, we had Kelly there for a little.
Mattis was there for a little while. We had some sane people controlling him. The controls are gone. And this guy's spinning wildly out of control.
And I think that could be a conclusion that people would reach.
Judy Woodruff: And, in fact, Mark, just — we just reported tonight that we learned that Mitch McConnell, Senate Republican leader, has written a piece — opinion piece for The Washington Post, saying it was a grave mistake, what the President did.
It's not every day that Mitch McConnell separates himself from the President like this.
Mark Shields: No, it certainly isn't.
And I just think — I think it's quite serious. I think Republicans I talk to are, frankly, nervous. They're nervous about the governorship in Mitch McConnell's home state, losing that, about losing both houses of the Virginia legislature.
These elections, Judy, are just basically 10 days away. And it's a — it's really — and they're concerned that they lose again in Louisiana, the Democrats elected there. Those are red states, purple states that they're losing.
And if Donald Trump is there, they're going to go into 2020 just blissfully, having sustained enormous losses in red states in November of 2019, and watching this happen.
I mean, this is — this is truly — when — the Turks said, we got everything we wanted, the easiest negotiation we have ever had. Erdogan took the President's letter, put it in the trash can, but he's not forgetting what was in it, was, don't be a fool.
I mean, I don't know how, at any point, you could defend, explain, apologize or say, let's go forward. Let's get four more years of this.
For the first time that I can remember (I'm 74) I witnessed an American President betray an ally and the American people. In 2018 Trump promised the Kurds we would protect them if they fought ISIS as our ally. Trump has absolutely no honer.
SUMMARY: In the days since the announced withdrawal of U.S. troops from northern Syria, the country’s map is being redrawn. Both Turkey and the Russia-backed Syrian regime made territorial advances, and U.S.-partner Syrian Democratic Forces turned to Damascus for support. As a result, an estimated 130,000 civilians have fled their homes, and imprisoned ISIS fighters have escaped. Nick Schifrin reports.
SUMMARY:President Trump’s decision to withdraw U.S. forces from northern Syria has profound implications for stability both within Syria and throughout the Middle East. Nick Schifrin talks to the University of Oklahoma’s Joshua Landis and career diplomat Ted Kattouf of Amideast about how Trump has handled the move and what it means for Syrian Kurds, Russian President Vladimir Putin and other U.S. allies.
SUMMARY: In 2012, the Syrian city of Manbij joined nation-wide protests. In 2014, those Syrian rebels lost the city to the Islamic State group. In 2016, the U.S. fought back with the help of Kurdish forces, liberating the city. In 2018, U.S. troops arrived to help stabilize Manbij as it recovered. But last week the U.S. started to withdraw, and a free-for-all began. Nick Schifrin reports.
SUMMARY: Vice President Mike Pence and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo met with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Ankara on Thursday about Turkey’s military offensive in northern Syria. They agreed to a five-day pause in the operation, but disagreed about whether or not it constitutes a "cease-fire." Judy Woodruff reports and sits down with Serdar Kilic, Turkish ambassador to the U.S., to discuss.
SUMMARY: The battleground in northeastern Syria appears to be quieting, after a cease-fire between Turkish forces and Kurdish fighters got off to a rocky start. But will Turkey keep its word -- and was the U.S. pullout from the region appropriate? President Trump's decision to withdraw troops has drawn bipartisan condemnation, with Sen. Mitch McConnell calling it a “grave mistake.” Amna Nawaz reports.
SUMMARY:As Kurdish fighters evacuated areas of Syria near the Turkish border on Sunday, a U.S. official said American forces in the region will be redeployed to Iraq to conduct operations against the Islamic State. Those developments came as Lebanon’s prime minister agreed to reforms amid widespread protests. Associated Press reporter Sarah El Deeb joins Alison Stewart from Beirut to discuss.
I am Retired U.S. Navy (22yrs) and a Vietnam Veteran. After my Navy retirement I was in the computer related industry, now retired. In 2000 I was a registered Republican and voted for George W. Bush. Six months of having Bush in the Whitehouse forced me to re-evaluate my political stance. I had always thought of myself as a Moderate Republican, but was a Republican by "default" NOT because of close examination of the GOP. Due to what has happened in America since 2000, I now consider myself a progressive, and registered as a Non-Affiliated voter.
*Anti-First Amendment policies that attempt to turn America into a theocracy by enshrining ANY religious belief as law.
* Any attempt to suppress human or Constitutional rights.
* Any law or policy that supports discrimination based on religion, ethnicity, race/color, gender, sexual orientation, or any law that does NOT support Equal Treatment under the law.
*Any law or policy that attempts to suppress Freedom of the Press or Free Speech.
LINK DISCLAIMER:
There is no guarantee that any link provided in this blog will always work, especially for older links. The validity of any link is governed by the source-site policies. Some sites will archive articles and require subscription to access. Very small sites, such as a local town newspaper, may not archive at all.