Showing posts with label Trump Talk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Trump Talk. Show all posts

Monday, June 11, 2018

TRUMP AGENDA - War on Law Enforcement

aka "Trump the MOB Boss"

"Brennan: Trump threatened by law enforcement because they can expose his falsehoods" PBS NewsHour 6/7/2018

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  Former CIA Director John Brennan says he has become an outspoken critic of President Trump because, he charges, Trump “is deceiving the American public, and it’s going to have...negative consequences for our national security.”  Brennan joins Nick Schifrin to discuss why he feels a responsibility to condemn the President, plus whether Trump’s North Korea’s strategy is working.

Monday, January 22, 2018

TRUMP TALK - The Racist

IMHO:  It is likely Trump actually believes that he's not racist, but his offhand remarks throughout his life says different. Trump IS a racist.

"On MLK Day, U.S. grapples with furor over Trump’s words" PBS NewsHour 1/15/2018

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  This year's memorials honoring Martin Luther King Jr. came amid the ongoing furor over President Trump's alleged comments and his views on race.  While the President released a video commemorating the civil rights hero, his derogatory words reported last week about African and Haitian immigrants hang in the air, as partisan acrimony threatens hope of a DACA deal.  Judy Woodruff reports.




"Jelani Cobb: ‘It’s impossible to avoid the conclusion that Donald Trump is racist’" PBS NewsHour 1/15/2018

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  President Trump's recent reported use of vulgar language to describe some immigrants has prompted backlash from both the right and left.  It also raises questions about his own personal history on issues of race, and how his perspective affects the nation.  Judy Woodruff gets reaction and analysis from Peter Wehner of the Ethics and Public Policy Center and Jelani Cobb of The New Yorker.

Peter Wehner, lifelong Republican: Yes, I do believe that he used these words.  I don’t think there is much question about it.

Republicans like Lindsey Graham have confirmed that he used it.  And this is all part of a piece with him.  This is the latest link in a long, malicious chain for Donald Trump, a chain that’s connected by racist sentiments toward Mexicans, toward Muslims, and toward African-Americans.

In terms of what it says about him and how I interpret it as a lifelong Republican, it’s extremely painful, it’s revealing.  And what it says about Donald Trump and about Trump supporters is that they are racist or that they find great appeal in racist sentiments and expressions of racial division.

You know, Donald Trump is appealing to the worst instincts of America and, unfortunately, his supporters are responding to it.

Wednesday, August 16, 2017

DOCUMENTING HATE - What Charlottesville Exposes



"A New Generation of White Supremacists Emerges in Charlottesville" by A.C. Thompson and Karim Hajj, ProPublica 8/13/2017

The white supremacist forces arrayed in Charlottesville, Virginia, over the weekend — the largest gathering of its sort in at least a generation — represented a new incarnation of the white supremacy movement.  Old-guard groups like the Ku Klux Klan, the Aryan Nations and the Nazi skinheads, which had long stood at the center of racist politics in America, were largely absent.

Instead, the ranks of the young men who drove to Charlottesville with clubs, shields, pepper spray and guns, included many college-educated people who have left the political mainstream in favor of extremist ideologies over the past few years.  A large number have adopted a very clean cut, frat-boyish look designed to appeal to the average white guy in a way that KKK robes or skinhead regalia never could.  Interviews show that at least some of these leaders have spent time in the U.S. armed forces.

Many belong to new organizations like Vanguard America, Identity Evropa, the Traditionalist Workers Party and True Cascadia, which have seen their numbers expand dramatically in the past year.  Most of these groups view themselves as part of a broader “alt-right” movement that represents the extreme edge of right-wing politics in the U.S.

These organizations exhibited unprecedented organization and tactical savvy.  Hundreds of racist activists converged on a park on Friday night, striding through the darkness in groups of five to 20 people.  A handful of leaders with headsets and handheld radios gave orders as a pickup truck full of torches pulled up nearby.  Within minutes, their numbers had swelled well into the hundreds.  They quickly and efficiently formed a lengthy procession and begun marching, torches alight, through the campus of the University of Virginia.

Despite intense interest from the media, police and local anti-racists, the white supremacists kept the location of their intimidating nighttime march secret until the last moment.

The next day, the far-right forces — likely numbering between 1,000 and 1,500 — marched to Emancipation Park.  Once again, they arrived in small blocs under military-style command.  The racist groups were at least as organized and disciplined as the police, who appeared to have no clear plan for what to do when the violence escalated.  The racist groups stood their ground at the park and were not dislodged for many hours.

For many of them, this will be seen as victory.  “Every rally we're going to be more organized, we're going to have more people, and it's going to be harder and harder for them to shut us down,” said a spokesman for Vanguard America, a fascist group, who gave his name as “Thomas.”  “White people are pretty good at getting organized.”

And though police arrested James Fields Jr., a 20-year-old Ohio man, for allegedly driving a Dodge Charger into a crowd of anti-racist protesters, killing 32-year-old Heather Heyer and wounding many others, the white supremacists generally avoided arrests.

They also outmaneuvered their anti-racist opponents.  On Saturday, a multifaith group met at the historic First Baptist Church for a sunrise prayer ceremony featuring academic Cornel West and pastor Traci Blackmon.  The anti-racists, many of them clergy members, walked quietly to Emancipation Park, where they were vastly outnumbered by the white supremacists.

Later, a band of more aggressive counter-protesters showed up at the park, chanting “Appalachia coming at ya.  Nazi punks we're gonna smash ya!”  These militant “antifa,” or antifascists, were also repelled by the white supremacists.

Given the scale of the protests, the far-right groups suffered few injuries.  That was particularly notable given the fact that multiple people near the protests were armed.  Throughout the weekend, right-wing and left-wing militias equipped with assault rifles, pistols, and body armor patrolled the streets of Charlottesville.  (Virginia is an “open carry” state, so gun owners are legally allowed to tote around firearms.)

Many of the armed men viewed their role as maintaining a modicum of order.  A “Three Percenter” militia out of New York state posted itself near Emancipation Park with the intention of keeping anti-racists from disrupting the rally.  The group says it disapproves of racism but is dedicated to defending the free speech rights of all.

Blocks away, Redneck Revolt, a leftist militia from North Carolina, watched over the perimeter of a park where anti-racists had gathered, committed to preventing violent attacks by the white supremacist groups.

The presence of heavily armed citizens may have played a role in the decision of authorities to largely stay out of the violent skirmishes between the white supremacists and their opponents.

Those who actually marched included many new to the right-wing cause.  The victory of Donald Trump in last year's presidential election has energized a whole wave of young people who were previously apathetic or apolitical, rally organizer Eli Mosley told ProPublicaThe President has served as “megaphone” for far-right ideas, he said.

Mosley and his comrades are seeking to draw in as many of these newly politicized young people as possible.  “We're winning,” he said.  “We're targeting the youth and making a movement that appeals to the youth.”

Some of those who've gravitated to the extreme right milieu are former liberals — like Mosley's fellow rally organizer Jason Kessler — and supporters of Bernie Sanders.  Many are ex-Libertarians.

“I was a libertarian,” said Mosley, as white supremacists chanted “Whose streets?  Our streets!” in the background.  “I looked around and noticed that most Libertarians were white men.  I decided that the left was winning with identity politics, so I wanted to play identity politics too.  I'm fascinated by leftist tactics, I read Saul Alinsky, Martin Luther King …  This is our '60s movement.”

Monday, August 14, 2017

OPINION - Brooks and Marcus 8/11/2017

"Brooks and Marcus on Trump's threats for North Korea, thanks for Putin" PBS NewsHour 8/11/2017

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  New York Times columnist David Brooks and Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus join Judy Woodruff to discuss the week's news, including President Trump's tough words for North Korea over its nuclear threat, as well as his thanking Russian President Vladimir Putin for expelling hundreds of U.S. diplomats, plus his attacking Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

JUDY WOODRUFF (NewsHour):  And to the analysis of Brooks and Marcus.  That's New York Times columnist David Brooks and Washington Post deputy editorial page editor Ruth Marcus.  Mark Shields is away.

And we welcome both of you.

So, you just heard two very different views from our earlier expert guests on North Korea.

You heard the President again commenting, David, and now Senator Risch.  How do you assess the President's management of this North Korea situation?

DAVID BROOKS, The New York Times:  Unusual, I guess.

(LAUGHTER)

DAVID BROOKS:  It will come after the war in Venezuela, apparently, we just learned.  I don't know what that was all about.

Listen, there's been a consensus of how to deal with this extremely knotty problem.  And that is, at least on the rhetorical level, the North Korean regime is extremely fiery, extremely insecure, sometimes hysterical.

And when you're around somebody who's screaming and unstable, the last thing you want to do is add to the instability with your own unstable, hysterical rhetoric.

And so most administrations, Republican and Democrats, when the North Koreans say they're going to Seoul into a lake of fire, whatever their rhetoric is, have just ignored it and relied on some underlying sense that the North Koreans don't want to commit national suicide.

Donald Trump has gone the other way.  Now, I think that is still — that sense that neither party wants to go into a war is still there.  But the psychological probabilities that you're going to enter into some August 1914 miscalculation certainly go up when both people are screaming at the top of their lungs.

JUDY WOODRUFF:  But, Ruth, you Justice Department heard Senator Risch, who says he talks to the White House.  And he said: I have talked to the President, and we think being very clear with North Korea is the best way to go.

RUTH MARCUS, The Washington Post:  Yes.

Well, David used the term unusual.  I think it's just absolutely scary.  And I didn't feel calmed down listening to Senator Risch, I have to say.

But there's a couple of positive things to say about President Trump here, just to surprise people for a second.  One is that this situation with North Korea is not his fault.  In other words, we were going to get to this.  Some President was going to end up in the terrible situation we have with the progress that North Korea has made with nuclear weapons.  He [Trump] just happens to be the President.

Number two, they were doing a very good job, until this latest eruptions of kind of bullying testosterone this week, in terms of pursuing what needs to be done, which is the diplomatic sanctions.  Senator Risch is right about the achievement in the Security Council.

But, all of a sudden, we saw this week these statements, and you would have thought Tuesday that maybe it was an eruption and they'd tamp it down.  And, instead, day after day after day, he's coming out saying more scary and dangerous things.

And I do not understand how that is anything but destabilizing, and with a very already unstable ally [enemy?].

DAVID BROOKS:  Yes.

Well, it could be that he thinks the North Koreans are undeterrable, and that this is not a usual regime, maybe because they have this new leader, and that you actually do have to take action.  He could be — he believes that.

It could be he just likes to blunder.  It’s always dangerous to overinterpret what Donald Trump says at any one moment.  And it could be he thinks the 'madman theory' is right theory here.  And the madman…

JUDY WOODRUFF:  Remind everybody what the madman — because it sounds scary.

(LAUGHTER)

DAVID BROOKS:  The 'madman theory' is that you can be a successful deterrer if you — if they think you could be crazy.

And so I think it can be very effective, so long as you’re not actually crazy.  And so we have a North Korean, we’re not really sure.  We have a President who has his moments.

And so the 'madman theory,' when both people could actually be crazy, is actually a very dangerous situation.
[ 😲 ]

TRUMP TALK - The Clown's Conference

"Trump has kinder words for Putin than McConnell at news conference" PBS NewsHour 8/10/2017

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  President Trump offered a number of newsworthy exchanges from his New Jersey Golf club on Thursday, on topics ranging from Russian retaliation for new sanctions to his disappointment in Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.  John Yang joins Judy Woodruff to take a closer look.

NORTH KOREA - Escalation

Fat-Man vs Little-Boy


"Latest North Korea clash draws sharply different responses from Trump, top national security aides" PBS NewsHour 8/9/2017

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  As a war of words escalated between the North Korea and the U.S., Secretary of State Rex Tillerson urged calm, saying Americans should have no concerns about the rhetoric of the last few days.  The volley of tough talk follows reports that Pyongyang can now make nuclear weapons small enough to fit inside a long-range missile.  John Yang reports.




"How will North Korea react to mixed signals from U.S.?" PBS NewsHour 8/9/2017

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  Judy Woodruff talks to former Pentagon official Abraham Denmark and Mike Chinoy of the University of Southern California about the latest threats and counter-threats between Pyongyang and Washington and what options the U.S. has to defuse the situation.




"Trump fires back in war of words with North Korea" PBS NewsHour 8/10/2017

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  President Trump doubled down on his threats against North Korea on Thursday, and disparaged a quarter century of U.S. policy for the country.  Meanwhile, North Korea announced its plans to launch four intermediate-range missiles at the U.S. territory of Guam and state TV declared the U.S. President reckless.  Special correspondent Nick Schifrin reports.




"Cardin: Trump's warning for North Korea isn't a game plan" PBS NewsHour 8/10/2017

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  The August recess hasn't stopped members of Congress from weighing in on President Trump's latest warnings to North Korea.  Judy Woodruff speaks with Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Md) about the president's fiery comments and whether the administration has a well-thought-out strategy, plus how the U.S. should approach diplomacy while turning up the pressure on the nation.




"How likely is a military conflict with North Korea?" PBS NewsHour 8/11/2017

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  President Trump said the U.S. and its military is ready to deal with any provocation by the Pyongyang regime.  How do the president's words impact the Trump administration's options?  Judy Woodruff speaks with retired Adm. Dennis Blair, a former U.S. Pacific Forces commander, and former CIA analyst Sue Mi Terry to get some insight into the reclusive regime and how the U.S. should proceed.




"What's the view of U.S. tensions from Pyongyang?" PBS NewsHour 8/11/2017

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  President Trump denounced North Korea yet again Friday, affirming the U.S. and its military are ready to deal with any further provocation from Pyongyang.  Despite the tensions, it was revealed that U.S. and North Korean diplomats have had back channel discussions recently.  Nick Schifrin looks at the internal response and gets the North Korean perspective from Rafael Wober of Associated Press.