SUMMARY: Ray Suarez talks with journalist Phil Bronstein who wrote an Esquire profile of the Navy SEAL credited with killing Osama bin Laden. Since the SEAL -- known as "the shooter" -- retired from service, but he's been met with significant challenges, or as Bronstein writes, "no landing pad in civilian life."
JIM LEHRER (Editor, Newshour): And finally tonight, the analysis of Shields and Brooks, syndicated columnist Mark Shields, New York Times columnist David Brooks.
Mark, did you know about SEAL Team Six until this -- until a few days ago?
MARK SHIELDS: No.
JIM LEHRER: Did you, David?
DAVID BROOKS: No, I did not.
JIM LEHRER: Yes. It's fascinating.
MARK SHIELDS: Truly fascinating. And, I mean, talk about a great segment, fascinating spokespersons. I mean, they were compelling.
JIM LEHRER: Yes, the two -- you mean the two men themselves.
MARK SHIELDS: The two of them, yes.
JIM LEHRER: You could tell that they were ready to go.
MARK SHIELDS: They were.
(LAUGHTER)
JIM LEHRER: If called upon, they could go now.
DAVID BROOKS: Yes.
I often think why the military really is the one institution that is -- that has high regard -- and we have had loss of faith in all these institution. And why is that? And one theory, I think, is that they really tear people down.
It's not about ego in the military. They tear down the ego, before you build up towards service to something else. And we actually have very few institutions that do that anymore. And there are pros and cons to tearing people down. But it does lead to this sort of understated sense of service and commitment to something other than themselves, and an aversion to publicity, which is admirable.
JIM LEHRER: And the idea, as both of them said, that they function as teams.
DAVID BROOKS: Right.
JIM LEHRER: And that's where the breaking down goes, and then you come back together. You go down there as individuals; you come out as a team.
DAVID BROOKS: And we have done well in general, most institutions, in celebrating the individual, not so much the team you're on.
MARK SHIELDS: Yes. No, I just think it -- I agree with you. They do break down.
But what they put in the place is a sense of your dependence upon each other. And they submerge rampant individualism, which our society too often celebrates.
DAVID BROOKS: Right. Exactly.
JIM LEHRER: What about Ray's question, though, about scrutiny, about oversight? Are these -- is there a danger that these guys are so good, and so at the command of the president, that other people may not know what's going on until it's too late?
MARK SHIELDS: Well, I think, in this particular instance, they did inform the leadership.
JIM LEHRER: Congress.
MARK SHIELDS: Congress. But I thought the point of scrutiny that the senator made about watching this did bring to it a level of civilian control and oversight that was unimaginable in an earlier era.
From this retired Navy Chief (22yrs, Viet Nam Vet), I salute all SEALs. Being a home-town San Diegan, where the SEAL boot camp is located, I am proud.
Also, I was surprised that SEAL Team 6 was specifically mentioned. I wonder it that was a slip.
I am Retired U.S. Navy (22yrs) and a Vietnam Veteran. After my Navy retirement I was in the computer related industry, now retired. In 2000 I was a registered Republican and voted for George W. Bush. Six months of having Bush in the Whitehouse forced me to re-evaluate my political stance. I had always thought of myself as a Moderate Republican, but was a Republican by "default" NOT because of close examination of the GOP. Due to what has happened in America since 2000, I now consider myself a progressive, and registered as a Non-Affiliated voter.
*Anti-First Amendment policies that attempt to turn America into a theocracy by enshrining ANY religious belief as law.
* Any attempt to suppress human or Constitutional rights.
* Any law or policy that supports discrimination based on religion, ethnicity, race/color, gender, sexual orientation, or any law that does NOT support Equal Treatment under the law.
*Any law or policy that attempts to suppress Freedom of the Press or Free Speech.
LINK DISCLAIMER:
There is no guarantee that any link provided in this blog will always work, especially for older links. The validity of any link is governed by the source-site policies. Some sites will archive articles and require subscription to access. Very small sites, such as a local town newspaper, may not archive at all.
