RACE IN AMERICA - Roseanne Barr's Tweet

Roseanne's Tweet was abhorrently raciest, and is NOT equivalent to using foul language.

"Roseanne Barr isn’t new to incendiary tweets.  Here’s why ABC decided to act" PBS NewsHour 5/29/2018

Excerpt

SUMMARY:  ABC canceled rebooted sitcom "Roseanne" on Tuesday over an offensive outburst by its creator and star.  Roseanne Barr wrote a racist tweet about Valerie Jarrett, a former senior advisor to President Obama.  William Brangham talks with Eric Deggans of NPR about ABC parting ways with what had become one of its most successful shows.

EDUCATION - Possible Cheating in DC Schools

"DC Schools Warned in 2009 About Possible Cheating" AP, ABC News 4/12/2013

An internal memo shows that District of Columbia schools officials were aware in early 2009 about the possibility of widespread cheating on standardized tests.

An analyst hired by then-schools chancellor Michelle Rhee found that 191 teachers at 70 schools had been implicated in possible testing infractions involving wrong answers that were erased and changed to the correct ones.

Investigations found isolated cheating but not to the extent suggested by the erasure rates.  One teacher was fired.

In Atlanta, dozens of educators, including the former superintendent face racketeering charges, accused of a widespread test cheating scandal.

D.C. school officials say the memo was based on incomplete information and flawed methodology.

The memo was obtained by journalist John Merrow, who shared it with The Associated Press.  USA Today was first to report the contents.

For non-U.S. readers:  "DC" = District of Columbia = Washington DC our national capital.

POLITICS - Media's Total Failure to Protect America

I could not believe the comments in the following article. Our media no longer thinks it has an obligation to act as watchdogs on the body politic. Our media has become totally an entertainment industry because the media corporations are concerned only with profit.

"Midterms and the Media" from FAIR (Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting)

Appearing on CNN's Reliable Sources (11/5/06), CBS reporter Jim Axelrod explained that reporting valuable information about candidates is not the media's top priority—and voters can get all that stuff someplace else anyway:

• "In this Internet age, there's no shortage of places to go if you want to read position papers or hear what candidate are holding forth about the economy, education, the environment, anything like that. But our job, especially in the last four or five days, is to take everything that's coming in and crystallize it through a filter of what is popping, what seems to be the most--I guess, what you'd call man biting dog, what's out of the ordinary."

Fox News Channel anchor and managing editor Brit Hume explained (Broadcasting & Cable, 11/6/06) why journalists shouldn't evaluate political advertising for accuracy:

• "I don't like the reporters that try to police them, tell you what's true and what's not. Most political ads are arguably true and arguably false. It you start trying to get into issues of truth and falsity, you end up doing what the candidates do, which is arguing. My view is, let 'em play. The truth is, negative ads work."

ABC political director Mark Halperin, on the other hand, seems to think that fact-checking the candidates and tracking stealth campaign techniques is simply too difficult (Slate, 10/30/06):

• "The networks don't spend anything like they used to on covering elections, but we still have as many resources as anyone else devoted to trying to hold the candidates and campaigns accountable to the public interest. But it isn't easy. Even with all the modern technology out there, tracking new television ads is merely really, really hard, while tracking radio ads, church fliers, and those robo-calls that come at the very end is nearly impossible. And once you get a hold of the content, figuring out how to truth-squad the item, and then report it in context, is among the toughest tasks in daily journalism."

Judging media coverage of elections is often reduced to asking whether the press was fair to this candidate or that. The better question, though, is whether the press was fair to the American voters.

The old media is dead, killed by profit motivated corporate owners of our media outlets. Gone are the days of Woods & Bernstein and media as the "5th estate," there to be a watchdog for the American people. If we had today's media back then, Nixon would never had to resign.

Sad, very sad.