Tuesday, July 31, 2007

REAL DANGER - One Step Away From American Dictatorship

Until recently I thought that the danger of America becoming a dictatorship was a small, almost to the vanishing point, danger. A danger to Constitutional protection of our Individual Rights.

As of now, I wonder if we are one step away from dictatorship by any President. Here's why:


On September 30, 2006, the Congress modified the Insurrection Act as part of the 2007 Defense Authorization Bill. Section 1076 of the new law changes Sec. 333 of the "Insurrection Act," and widens the President's ability to deploy troops within the United States to enforce the laws. Under this act, the President may also deploy troops as a police force during a natural disaster, epidemic, serious public health emergency, terrorist attack, or other condition, when the President determines that the authorities of the state are incapable of maintaining public order. The bill also modified Sec. 334 of the Insurrection Act, giving the President authority to order the dispersal of either insurgents or "those obstructing the enforcement of the laws." The new law changed the name of the chapter from "Insurrection" to "Enforcement of the Laws to Restore Public Order."

The 2007 Defense Authorization Bill, with over $500 billion allocated to the military, and which also contained the changes to the Insurrection Act of 1807, was passed by a bipartisan majority of both houses of Congress: 398-23 in the House and by unanimous consent in the Senate.[1] In order for military forces to be used under the provisions of the revised Insurrection Act, the following conditions must be met:

(1) The President may employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal service, to--

(A) restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United States, the President determines that--

(i) domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of maintaining public order; and

(ii) such violence results in a condition described in paragraph (2); or

(B) suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy if such insurrection, violation, combination, or conspiracy results in a condition described in paragraph (2).

(2) A condition described in this paragraph is a condition that--

(A) so hinders the execution of the laws of a State or possession, as applicable, and of the United States within that State or possession, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State or possession are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or

(B) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.

Note, this article includes charts comparing the old/new law.

The problem with these amended laws it that any President makes the determination if they apply without consulting or approval of Congress or the courts.

There is no provision to ensure that a future President does not abuse these statutes. There are no checks-and-balances.

I do pay attention to world history, and this type of power is what every crack-pot dictator has used to suspend the people's rights. In many cases, once they have the power, they disband the legislature and courts. Look at the history of some of the South American dictators of the past.

We will loose our Constitutional Rights if any President, on his/her own interpretation, enacts the provision of these statutes as they stand today. All such a President need do is to say we are under attack, or people protesting the Administration are in insurrection.

No comments: